Comparative analysis on phytonutrient properties of different fig varieties (Ficus spp.)

Shireen Nigar , Islam Md Shimul , Md. Sakhawot Hossain , Razia Sultana , Sharmin Asha , A.K. Obidul Huq
{"title":"Comparative analysis on phytonutrient properties of different fig varieties (Ficus spp.)","authors":"Shireen Nigar ,&nbsp;Islam Md Shimul ,&nbsp;Md. Sakhawot Hossain ,&nbsp;Razia Sultana ,&nbsp;Sharmin Asha ,&nbsp;A.K. Obidul Huq","doi":"10.1016/j.focha.2024.100878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Figs are renowned for their rich array of bioactive compounds, offering significant nutritional and medicinal potential. This study compared the phytochemicals, antioxidants, and antinutrients content of <em>Ficus racemosa</em> and <em>Ficus hispida</em> with <em>Ficus carica</em> and assessed the effects of two drying methods, oven drying (50–55 °C for 24 h) and sun drying. Total phenolic (TPC) and flavonoid content (TFC) were quantified using Folin-Ciocalteu and aluminum chloride colorimetric assays. Phytate and oxalate contents were measured as antinutrients. Results showed that <em>Ficus racemosa</em> pulp and seeds had the highest TPC of 90 mg GAE/g and Radical Scavenging Activity (RSA) of 90.89 % among oven-dried samples. <em>Ficus hispida</em> and <em>Ficus racemosa</em> exhibited higher TFC than <em>Ficus carica</em>, with <em>Ficus hispida</em> at 228.53 mg QE/g (sun-dried) and 132.26 mg QE/g (oven-dried). In contrast, <em>Ficus carica</em> had significantly lower TFC (21.14–50.33 mg QE/g). Oven-dried samples showed higher RSA, phytate, and oxalate levels than sun-dried samples. <em>Ficus hispida</em> and <em>Ficus racemosa</em>, two local fig species, showed higher phenolic and flavonoid content and better RSA than the Mediterranean <em>Ficus carica</em>, presenting better nutritional and medicinal potential. The local fig fruit can serve as an excellent source of beneficial bioactive compounds, minerals, and dietary fibers in Bangladesh.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73040,"journal":{"name":"Food chemistry advances","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100878"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food chemistry advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772753X24002727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Figs are renowned for their rich array of bioactive compounds, offering significant nutritional and medicinal potential. This study compared the phytochemicals, antioxidants, and antinutrients content of Ficus racemosa and Ficus hispida with Ficus carica and assessed the effects of two drying methods, oven drying (50–55 °C for 24 h) and sun drying. Total phenolic (TPC) and flavonoid content (TFC) were quantified using Folin-Ciocalteu and aluminum chloride colorimetric assays. Phytate and oxalate contents were measured as antinutrients. Results showed that Ficus racemosa pulp and seeds had the highest TPC of 90 mg GAE/g and Radical Scavenging Activity (RSA) of 90.89 % among oven-dried samples. Ficus hispida and Ficus racemosa exhibited higher TFC than Ficus carica, with Ficus hispida at 228.53 mg QE/g (sun-dried) and 132.26 mg QE/g (oven-dried). In contrast, Ficus carica had significantly lower TFC (21.14–50.33 mg QE/g). Oven-dried samples showed higher RSA, phytate, and oxalate levels than sun-dried samples. Ficus hispida and Ficus racemosa, two local fig species, showed higher phenolic and flavonoid content and better RSA than the Mediterranean Ficus carica, presenting better nutritional and medicinal potential. The local fig fruit can serve as an excellent source of beneficial bioactive compounds, minerals, and dietary fibers in Bangladesh.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food chemistry advances
Food chemistry advances Analytical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Chemistry (General), Molecular Biology
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
99 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信