Waste heat recovery of a combined internal combustion engine and inverse brayton cycle for hydrogen and freshwater outputs: 4E optimization and comparison

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Mohammad Zoghi, Nasser Hosseinzadeh, Saleh Gharaie, Ali Zare
{"title":"Waste heat recovery of a combined internal combustion engine and inverse brayton cycle for hydrogen and freshwater outputs: 4E optimization and comparison","authors":"Mohammad Zoghi,&nbsp;Nasser Hosseinzadeh,&nbsp;Saleh Gharaie,&nbsp;Ali Zare","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2024.100356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In power plants, internal combustion engines (ICEs) continue to serve as a prevalent source of power generation. Despite advancements in ICE performance over the past decade, significant amounts of energy are still wasted through exhaust gases and jacket cooling water. In this study, advanced waste heat recovery technologies are explored to enhance the overall efficiency of ICE power plants. Initially, an inverse Brayton cycle (IBC) is employed for exhaust gas energy recovery in a 500 kW ICE. Subsequently, waste energy in the heat rejection stage of the IBC and the exhausted gas from the compressor is recovered using a thermoelectric generator (TEG) and an absorption chiller. Additionally, the extra electricity generated by the TEG is directed to a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer and a reverse osmosis desalination unit, producing hydrogen and potable water as additional outputs. Furthermore, energy from the jacket cooling water is recovered in a hot water unit. The 4E (energy, exergy, exergy-economic, and environmental) performance of the two configurations is compared by sensitivity analysis and design optimization. Exergy efficiency and unit cost of product (UCOP) are obtained as 36.09% and 58.303 $/GJ for the stand-alone engine. They are calculated at 39.62% and 64.553 $/GJ and 43.05% and 62.06 $/GJ for Configurations 1 and 2, respectively, in the optimum mode. In this case, Configuration 2 leads to the highest efficiency, and while the UCOP of Configuration 2 is better than that of Configuration 1, the stand-alone engine has the best value of UCOP. This suggests that converting a stand-alone engine to an integrated system with multiple useful outputs is a feasible and beneficial strategy for improving power plant efficiency and sustainability. Furthermore, in the optimum mode and for Configuration 2, improvements of 1.36% and 1.49% are reported for exergy efficiency and UCOP in comparison with the base case mode.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100356"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427124000871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In power plants, internal combustion engines (ICEs) continue to serve as a prevalent source of power generation. Despite advancements in ICE performance over the past decade, significant amounts of energy are still wasted through exhaust gases and jacket cooling water. In this study, advanced waste heat recovery technologies are explored to enhance the overall efficiency of ICE power plants. Initially, an inverse Brayton cycle (IBC) is employed for exhaust gas energy recovery in a 500 kW ICE. Subsequently, waste energy in the heat rejection stage of the IBC and the exhausted gas from the compressor is recovered using a thermoelectric generator (TEG) and an absorption chiller. Additionally, the extra electricity generated by the TEG is directed to a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer and a reverse osmosis desalination unit, producing hydrogen and potable water as additional outputs. Furthermore, energy from the jacket cooling water is recovered in a hot water unit. The 4E (energy, exergy, exergy-economic, and environmental) performance of the two configurations is compared by sensitivity analysis and design optimization. Exergy efficiency and unit cost of product (UCOP) are obtained as 36.09% and 58.303 $/GJ for the stand-alone engine. They are calculated at 39.62% and 64.553 $/GJ and 43.05% and 62.06 $/GJ for Configurations 1 and 2, respectively, in the optimum mode. In this case, Configuration 2 leads to the highest efficiency, and while the UCOP of Configuration 2 is better than that of Configuration 1, the stand-alone engine has the best value of UCOP. This suggests that converting a stand-alone engine to an integrated system with multiple useful outputs is a feasible and beneficial strategy for improving power plant efficiency and sustainability. Furthermore, in the optimum mode and for Configuration 2, improvements of 1.36% and 1.49% are reported for exergy efficiency and UCOP in comparison with the base case mode.
联合内燃机余热回收与逆布雷顿循环氢气和淡水输出:4E优化与比较
在发电厂,内燃机(ice)继续作为一种普遍的发电来源。尽管在过去的十年里,内燃机的性能有了很大的进步,但大量的能源仍然浪费在废气和导管套冷却水上。在本研究中,探索先进的余热回收技术,以提高ICE发电厂的整体效率。最初,在500kw内燃机中采用逆布雷顿循环(IBC)进行废气能量回收。随后,利用热电发电机(TEG)和吸收式制冷机回收IBC散热阶段的废能和压缩机排出的气体。此外,TEG产生的额外电力被引导到质子交换膜电解槽和反渗透脱盐装置,产生氢气和饮用水作为额外的输出。此外,夹套冷却水的能量在热水装置中回收。通过灵敏度分析和设计优化,比较了两种配置的4E(能源、火用、火用经济和环境)性能。单机发动机的火用效率为36.09%,单位产品成本(UCOP)为58.303美元/GJ。在最优模式下,配置1和配置2的计算值分别为39.62%和64.553美元/GJ, 43.05%和62.06美元/GJ。在这种情况下,配置2的效率最高,而配置2的UCOP优于配置1,单机引擎的UCOP值最好。这表明,将一个独立的发动机转换成一个具有多种有用输出的综合系统是提高发电厂效率和可持续性的一个可行和有益的战略。此外,在最优模式和配置2中,与基本情况模式相比,报告的能效和UCOP分别提高了1.36%和1.49%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信