Decoding Living Lab sensing system through Bayesian networks: The preferable working space targeting comfort and productivity

IF 6.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Veronica Martins Gnecco , Ioannis Kousis , Ilaria Pigliautile , Anna Laura Pisello
{"title":"Decoding Living Lab sensing system through Bayesian networks: The preferable working space targeting comfort and productivity","authors":"Veronica Martins Gnecco ,&nbsp;Ioannis Kousis ,&nbsp;Ilaria Pigliautile ,&nbsp;Anna Laura Pisello","doi":"10.1016/j.jobe.2025.111913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Workplace environmental conditions significantly influence workers' well-being, health, and productivity. The understanding of the interaction between environmental factors across multiple domains can improve occupants' satisfaction and indoor conditions. This study aims to identify optimal office environmental conditions by analysing comfort demands and multi-domain interplay in a dynamic context. A year-long experimental campaign was performed in a Living Lab comprising five offices, monitoring indoor and outdoor environmental parameters and gathering occupants' feedback through surveys. Gaussian Naïve Bayes technique was applied to develop probabilistic models that identified optimal conditions for comfort and satisfaction, including self-perceived productivity as combined effect analysis. Participants showed more acceptability of warmer conditions in cooling seasons. Probabilistic models aligned with the current standards, indicating optimal temperatures of 22°C-24 °C for heating seasons and 23°C-24 °C for cooling seasons. Visual comfort was affected by the balance of natural and artificial light, with higher visual discomfort when the former was limited during cooling seasons. Temperatures higher than 22 °C demonstrated increased “stale air” discomfort, potentially linked to respiration and sweating, even without elevated CO₂ levels. Self-perceived productivity decreased in temperatures higher than 24 °C and CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations exceeding 800 ppm. Other factors and more comprehensive measurements, together with monitoring of physiological signals should be included in future studies, allowing the creation of guidelines for more comfortable office places. These findings offer valuable insights for enhancing workplace human-centric standards and regulations globally. They have the potential to shape policies that foster more sustainable productive environments for workers’ wellbeing worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of building engineering","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 111913"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of building engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352710225001494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Workplace environmental conditions significantly influence workers' well-being, health, and productivity. The understanding of the interaction between environmental factors across multiple domains can improve occupants' satisfaction and indoor conditions. This study aims to identify optimal office environmental conditions by analysing comfort demands and multi-domain interplay in a dynamic context. A year-long experimental campaign was performed in a Living Lab comprising five offices, monitoring indoor and outdoor environmental parameters and gathering occupants' feedback through surveys. Gaussian Naïve Bayes technique was applied to develop probabilistic models that identified optimal conditions for comfort and satisfaction, including self-perceived productivity as combined effect analysis. Participants showed more acceptability of warmer conditions in cooling seasons. Probabilistic models aligned with the current standards, indicating optimal temperatures of 22°C-24 °C for heating seasons and 23°C-24 °C for cooling seasons. Visual comfort was affected by the balance of natural and artificial light, with higher visual discomfort when the former was limited during cooling seasons. Temperatures higher than 22 °C demonstrated increased “stale air” discomfort, potentially linked to respiration and sweating, even without elevated CO₂ levels. Self-perceived productivity decreased in temperatures higher than 24 °C and CO2 concentrations exceeding 800 ppm. Other factors and more comprehensive measurements, together with monitoring of physiological signals should be included in future studies, allowing the creation of guidelines for more comfortable office places. These findings offer valuable insights for enhancing workplace human-centric standards and regulations globally. They have the potential to shape policies that foster more sustainable productive environments for workers’ wellbeing worldwide.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of building engineering
Journal of building engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1901
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Building Engineering is an interdisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of science and technology concerned with the whole life cycle of the built environment; from the design phase through to construction, operation, performance, maintenance and its deterioration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信