Propuesta de un listado de verificación quirúrgica complementario para la cirugía de los tumores cerebrales

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Antonio José Vargas López , Gador Ramos Bosquet , Carlos Fernández Carballal
{"title":"Propuesta de un listado de verificación quirúrgica complementario para la cirugía de los tumores cerebrales","authors":"Antonio José Vargas López ,&nbsp;Gador Ramos Bosquet ,&nbsp;Carlos Fernández Carballal","doi":"10.1016/j.neucir.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Once the WHO generic surgical checklist has been standardized and following the itinerary proposed, it is up to the different specialties to continue advancing in the improvement and adjustment of the checklists to the procedures and interventions in their field.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Through a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in which professionals from the surgical area of the Torrecárdenas University Hospital, Jaén Hospital Complex and Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital participated, aspects that could condition patient safety in the surgery of the brain tumors and that are not included in the WHO generic surgical checklist were recognized. The three authors gave a score between 1 and 5 to each of the proposed items incrementally depending on the degree of suitability. Based on the score obtained, they selected those who would be incorporated into the specific surgical checklist.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 24 candidate items were identified to be included in the specific check list. These obtained scores between 14 and 10 points. After this weighting, it was decided to include the 12 best-rated items in the final surgical checklist, six of them in the initial phase, three in the phase prior to the incision and another three in the final part of the checklist prior to the completion of the procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Professionals in the surgical area of Neurosurgery can identify aspects not included in the generic checklist whose non-compliance can condition the patient's safety at least to the same extent as those included in the generic list.</div><div>It is possible to propose a specific complementary checklist for brain tumor surgery, in charge of collecting aspects related to the safety and success of these procedures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51145,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia","volume":"36 1","pages":"Pages 8-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130147324000885","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Once the WHO generic surgical checklist has been standardized and following the itinerary proposed, it is up to the different specialties to continue advancing in the improvement and adjustment of the checklists to the procedures and interventions in their field.

Methods

Through a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in which professionals from the surgical area of the Torrecárdenas University Hospital, Jaén Hospital Complex and Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital participated, aspects that could condition patient safety in the surgery of the brain tumors and that are not included in the WHO generic surgical checklist were recognized. The three authors gave a score between 1 and 5 to each of the proposed items incrementally depending on the degree of suitability. Based on the score obtained, they selected those who would be incorporated into the specific surgical checklist.

Results

A total of 24 candidate items were identified to be included in the specific check list. These obtained scores between 14 and 10 points. After this weighting, it was decided to include the 12 best-rated items in the final surgical checklist, six of them in the initial phase, three in the phase prior to the incision and another three in the final part of the checklist prior to the completion of the procedure.

Conclusions

Professionals in the surgical area of Neurosurgery can identify aspects not included in the generic checklist whose non-compliance can condition the patient's safety at least to the same extent as those included in the generic list.
It is possible to propose a specific complementary checklist for brain tumor surgery, in charge of collecting aspects related to the safety and success of these procedures.
拟议的脑瘤手术补充手术清单
背景和目的一旦世卫组织通用外科检查表标准化并按照所建议的流程进行,就需要由不同的专科继续改进和调整检查表,以适应各自领域的手术和干预措施。方法通过Torrecárdenas大学医院外科专业人员、jasiman医院综合医院和Gregorio Marañón大学综合医院参与的失败模式和影响分析(FMEA),找出脑肿瘤手术中可能影响患者安全的因素,以及未列入WHO通用手术清单的因素。三位作者根据适用性的程度,给每个提议的项目增加了1到5分的分数。根据获得的分数,他们选择那些将被纳入特定手术清单的患者。结果共筛选出24个候选项目纳入具体检查清单。这些分数在14到10分之间。加权后,决定将12个评分最高的项目纳入最终手术清单,其中6个在初始阶段,3个在切口前阶段,另外3个在手术完成前的清单最后部分。结论神经外科领域的专业人员可以识别出通用清单中未包括的方面,这些方面的不遵守至少与通用清单中包含的方面相同,可以影响患者的安全。有可能为脑肿瘤手术提出一个具体的补充清单,负责收集与这些手术的安全性和成功相关的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurocirugia
Neurocirugia 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Neurocirugía is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (SENEC). It is published every 2 months (6 issues per year). Neurocirugía will consider for publication, original clinical and experimental scientific works associated with neurosurgery and other related neurological sciences. All manuscripts are submitted for review by experts in the field (peer review) and are carried out anonymously (double blind). The Journal accepts works written in Spanish or English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信