Development and characterization of gelatin-starch bioplastics: A comparative study of cassava, corn, and rice-based alternatives

Uvin Thavisha Jayalath , Himali Samaraweera , Amal Samarasinghe
{"title":"Development and characterization of gelatin-starch bioplastics: A comparative study of cassava, corn, and rice-based alternatives","authors":"Uvin Thavisha Jayalath ,&nbsp;Himali Samaraweera ,&nbsp;Amal Samarasinghe","doi":"10.1016/j.scenv.2024.100190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increasing global challenge of plastic pollution necessitates the exploration of sustainable alternatives to conventional plastics. This study investigates the development of bioplastics using pharmaceutical gelatin residue combined with starches derived from cassava, corn, and rice. The primary objective is to enhance bioplastic formulations by evaluating their mechanical, thermal, and biodegradability characteristics. The bioplastics were subjected to Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to assess their properties. The results indicate that cassava-based bioplastics exhibit superior hardness, water absorption, and biodegradation rate performance compared to their corn and rice counterparts. Specifically, cassava bioplastics demonstrated a hardness of 57.2 N, a water absorption capacity of 139.8 %, and a biodegradation rate of 67.0 % after 7 days. These findings underscore the potential of cassava-based bioplastics as viable, sustainable alternatives derived from renewable resources, offering an environmentally friendly solution to reduce plastic waste across various sectors, including packaging and agriculture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101196,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Chemistry for the Environment","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Chemistry for the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949839224001330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing global challenge of plastic pollution necessitates the exploration of sustainable alternatives to conventional plastics. This study investigates the development of bioplastics using pharmaceutical gelatin residue combined with starches derived from cassava, corn, and rice. The primary objective is to enhance bioplastic formulations by evaluating their mechanical, thermal, and biodegradability characteristics. The bioplastics were subjected to Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to assess their properties. The results indicate that cassava-based bioplastics exhibit superior hardness, water absorption, and biodegradation rate performance compared to their corn and rice counterparts. Specifically, cassava bioplastics demonstrated a hardness of 57.2 N, a water absorption capacity of 139.8 %, and a biodegradation rate of 67.0 % after 7 days. These findings underscore the potential of cassava-based bioplastics as viable, sustainable alternatives derived from renewable resources, offering an environmentally friendly solution to reduce plastic waste across various sectors, including packaging and agriculture.
明胶淀粉生物塑料的开发和表征:木薯、玉米和水稻基替代品的比较研究
日益严峻的全球塑料污染挑战要求探索传统塑料的可持续替代品。本研究探讨了利用药用明胶渣与木薯、玉米和大米淀粉相结合的生物塑料的开发。主要目的是通过评估生物塑料的机械、热和生物降解特性来增强生物塑料配方。采用傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)、热重分析(TGA)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对生物塑料进行了性能评价。结果表明,与玉米和水稻相比,木薯基生物塑料具有更高的硬度、吸水率和生物降解率。具体来说,木薯生物塑料的硬度为57.2 N,吸水率为139.8 %,7天后的生物降解率为67.0% %。这些发现强调了木薯基生物塑料作为可再生资源的可行、可持续替代品的潜力,为减少包括包装和农业在内的各个部门的塑料废物提供了一种环保的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信