Method of generating potential evapotranspiration with high precision and resolution

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Qingzhi Zhao , Lulu Chang , Hongwu Guo , Liangliang Wang , Yibin Yao , Wenjie Peng , Zufeng Li , Ningbo Wang
{"title":"Method of generating potential evapotranspiration with high precision and resolution","authors":"Qingzhi Zhao ,&nbsp;Lulu Chang ,&nbsp;Hongwu Guo ,&nbsp;Liangliang Wang ,&nbsp;Yibin Yao ,&nbsp;Wenjie Peng ,&nbsp;Zufeng Li ,&nbsp;Ningbo Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.asr.2024.10.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Potential evapotranspiration (PET) is a key factor in hydrological cycle and energy balance and plays an important role in drought and global climate change response. Existing observational and modeling methods for PET retrieval have their limitations, such as low precision and poor spatial resolution, which becomes the focus of this study. A hybrid PET fusion (HPF) method is proposed by fusing station- and grid-based PET, in which the PET expression is determined by considering the factors of location, temperature, and zenith total delay (ZTD). In addition, an improved Helmert variance component estimation method is introduced to determine the optimal weights of the HPF model. Corresponding data, which include monthly Thornthwaite (TH)-derived PET data with a spatial resolution of 0.25° × 0.25° and Penman–Monteith (PM)-derived PET data at 704 meteorological stations, over the past 60 years from 1959 to 2018 in China are selected. The 10-fold cross-validation method is introduced to evaluate the internal and external accuracies of the proposed HPF method. Statistical result shows that the average root mean square (RMS) of the proposed HPF method is 13.98 mm, with an average RMS improvement rate (IR) of 46.71 % compared with TH-derived PET, when PM-derived PET is regarded as a reference. Moreover, the performance of the HPF-derived standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) is evaluated at different time scales, and the average RMS is 0.3, with an average RMS IR of 26.33 % compared with TH-derived SPEI. Such results verify the good performance of the proposed HPF model and enrich the methods for obtaining PET with high precision and resolution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50850,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Space Research","volume":"75 2","pages":"Pages 1759-1774"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Space Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027311772401024X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Potential evapotranspiration (PET) is a key factor in hydrological cycle and energy balance and plays an important role in drought and global climate change response. Existing observational and modeling methods for PET retrieval have their limitations, such as low precision and poor spatial resolution, which becomes the focus of this study. A hybrid PET fusion (HPF) method is proposed by fusing station- and grid-based PET, in which the PET expression is determined by considering the factors of location, temperature, and zenith total delay (ZTD). In addition, an improved Helmert variance component estimation method is introduced to determine the optimal weights of the HPF model. Corresponding data, which include monthly Thornthwaite (TH)-derived PET data with a spatial resolution of 0.25° × 0.25° and Penman–Monteith (PM)-derived PET data at 704 meteorological stations, over the past 60 years from 1959 to 2018 in China are selected. The 10-fold cross-validation method is introduced to evaluate the internal and external accuracies of the proposed HPF method. Statistical result shows that the average root mean square (RMS) of the proposed HPF method is 13.98 mm, with an average RMS improvement rate (IR) of 46.71 % compared with TH-derived PET, when PM-derived PET is regarded as a reference. Moreover, the performance of the HPF-derived standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) is evaluated at different time scales, and the average RMS is 0.3, with an average RMS IR of 26.33 % compared with TH-derived SPEI. Such results verify the good performance of the proposed HPF model and enrich the methods for obtaining PET with high precision and resolution.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Space Research
Advances in Space Research 地学天文-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
800
审稿时长
5.8 months
期刊介绍: The COSPAR publication Advances in Space Research (ASR) is an open journal covering all areas of space research including: space studies of the Earth''s surface, meteorology, climate, the Earth-Moon system, planets and small bodies of the solar system, upper atmospheres, ionospheres and magnetospheres of the Earth and planets including reference atmospheres, space plasmas in the solar system, astrophysics from space, materials sciences in space, fundamental physics in space, space debris, space weather, Earth observations of space phenomena, etc. NB: Please note that manuscripts related to life sciences as related to space are no more accepted for submission to Advances in Space Research. Such manuscripts should now be submitted to the new COSPAR Journal Life Sciences in Space Research (LSSR). All submissions are reviewed by two scientists in the field. COSPAR is an interdisciplinary scientific organization concerned with the progress of space research on an international scale. Operating under the rules of ICSU, COSPAR ignores political considerations and considers all questions solely from the scientific viewpoint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信