Give and (Not) take: How transparency of refusals and acceptances in reciprocal exchange affects inequality

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Scott V. Savage , Monica M. Whitham
{"title":"Give and (Not) take: How transparency of refusals and acceptances in reciprocal exchange affects inequality","authors":"Scott V. Savage ,&nbsp;Monica M. Whitham","doi":"10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reciprocal exchange is the foundation of many of our social relationships. Research accounts for inequality in reciprocal exchange via a process of resource withholding, in which advantaged actors—either strategically or not—withhold valued resources from more dependent partners to instead invest in the self or in other relationships. In this study, we examine how contexts and experiences of transparent acceptances and refusals affect the tendency to withhold resources and consequently the emergence of inequality in reciprocal exchange networks. We argue processes that lead to inequality may be disrupted in situational contexts that remove uncertainty about whether reciprocal exchange offers are accepted or refused. Namely, structural pressures toward inequality should weaken as advantaged actors, who have more resources to contribute, become more likely to give and to give more abundantly. Results from an experiment generally support our predictions and provide novel insights into how contexts and experiences of refusal and acceptance affect inequality by modifying giving.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48338,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Research","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 103130"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X24001522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reciprocal exchange is the foundation of many of our social relationships. Research accounts for inequality in reciprocal exchange via a process of resource withholding, in which advantaged actors—either strategically or not—withhold valued resources from more dependent partners to instead invest in the self or in other relationships. In this study, we examine how contexts and experiences of transparent acceptances and refusals affect the tendency to withhold resources and consequently the emergence of inequality in reciprocal exchange networks. We argue processes that lead to inequality may be disrupted in situational contexts that remove uncertainty about whether reciprocal exchange offers are accepted or refused. Namely, structural pressures toward inequality should weaken as advantaged actors, who have more resources to contribute, become more likely to give and to give more abundantly. Results from an experiment generally support our predictions and provide novel insights into how contexts and experiences of refusal and acceptance affect inequality by modifying giving.
给予与(非)索取:互惠交换中拒绝与接受的透明度如何影响不平等
互惠交换是我们许多社会关系的基础。研究通过资源扣留过程解释了互惠交换中的不平等,在这个过程中,有利的行为者——无论是战略性的还是非战略性的——从更依赖的伙伴那里扣留有价值的资源,转而投资于自己或其他关系。在本研究中,我们研究了透明接受和拒绝的背景和经历如何影响扣留资源的倾向,从而影响互惠交换网络中不平等的出现。我们认为,导致不平等的过程可能会在情境情境中被破坏,从而消除了互惠交换要约是否被接受或拒绝的不确定性。也就是说,不平等的结构性压力应该会减弱,因为拥有更多资源的有利行为者更有可能付出,而且付出得更充分。一项实验的结果总体上支持了我们的预测,并提供了关于拒绝和接受的背景和经历如何通过改变给予来影响不平等的新见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Social Science Research publishes papers devoted to quantitative social science research and methodology. The journal features articles that illustrate the use of quantitative methods in the empirical solution of substantive problems, and emphasizes those concerned with issues or methods that cut across traditional disciplinary lines. Special attention is given to methods that have been used by only one particular social science discipline, but that may have application to a broader range of areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信