A review on Linear Fresnel Reflector (LFR) as a solar line concentrator in polygeneration for low-medium temperature applications among the rural livelihoods

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Sanju John Thomas , Sudhansu S. Sahoo , Sheffy Thomas , Ajith Kumar G , Mohamed M. Awad
{"title":"A review on Linear Fresnel Reflector (LFR) as a solar line concentrator in polygeneration for low-medium temperature applications among the rural livelihoods","authors":"Sanju John Thomas ,&nbsp;Sudhansu S. Sahoo ,&nbsp;Sheffy Thomas ,&nbsp;Ajith Kumar G ,&nbsp;Mohamed M. Awad","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2024.100340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rural electrification is exhaustive, costly, and lacks paybacks while renewable energy interventions are policy-influenced usually taking a top-down approach. The livelihood activities are energy intensive, while specific in nature and requirement. There exists an inherent nexus among rural livelihoods between energy-water-food, which is often not explored., while polygeneration and cogeneration methods can benefit this nexus. Parabolic trough collectors (PTC), heliostats, and Linear Fresnel Reflectors (LFR) are solar concentrators used for high-temperature steam generation. The LFR has the advantage of easy installation, reduced structures, good optical efficiency, flexible designs, and direct steam generation at a temperature range of 80 C - to 400 C, which can be a techno-commercial competitor for evacuated tube collectors (ETC) and PTC. An extensive review of the energy requirement in various rural livelihoods and the potential of solar concentrators with a focus on the PTC and LFR, with their limitation and the advantages are done. While the LFR can match the optical efficiency of the PTC, it is found that the two-phase flow and the entropy generation are the limitations, while easy installations, custom designs, and reduced structures are the advantages over the PTC. The review and comparison have found that there is a difference between the thermal energy produced per mirror area and the land area with respect to PTC and the LFR. Concerning application in the diary industry, it is found that with the modifications in LFR, the thermal energy produced per square meter of land by LFR can be 300 MW<sub>h</sub>/m<sup>2,</sup> while the PTC produces 225 MW<sub>h</sub> / m<sup>2</sup> in comparison with 180 MW<sub>h</sub> /m<sup>2</sup>. This shows that LFR modifications including reduced receiver height, inclined mirror, and double reflectors can make it the ideal solar collector for rural livelihood applications for low-medium heat requirements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100340"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427124000718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rural electrification is exhaustive, costly, and lacks paybacks while renewable energy interventions are policy-influenced usually taking a top-down approach. The livelihood activities are energy intensive, while specific in nature and requirement. There exists an inherent nexus among rural livelihoods between energy-water-food, which is often not explored., while polygeneration and cogeneration methods can benefit this nexus. Parabolic trough collectors (PTC), heliostats, and Linear Fresnel Reflectors (LFR) are solar concentrators used for high-temperature steam generation. The LFR has the advantage of easy installation, reduced structures, good optical efficiency, flexible designs, and direct steam generation at a temperature range of 80 C - to 400 C, which can be a techno-commercial competitor for evacuated tube collectors (ETC) and PTC. An extensive review of the energy requirement in various rural livelihoods and the potential of solar concentrators with a focus on the PTC and LFR, with their limitation and the advantages are done. While the LFR can match the optical efficiency of the PTC, it is found that the two-phase flow and the entropy generation are the limitations, while easy installations, custom designs, and reduced structures are the advantages over the PTC. The review and comparison have found that there is a difference between the thermal energy produced per mirror area and the land area with respect to PTC and the LFR. Concerning application in the diary industry, it is found that with the modifications in LFR, the thermal energy produced per square meter of land by LFR can be 300 MWh/m2, while the PTC produces 225 MWh / m2 in comparison with 180 MWh /m2. This shows that LFR modifications including reduced receiver height, inclined mirror, and double reflectors can make it the ideal solar collector for rural livelihood applications for low-medium heat requirements.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信