A framework for enhancing safety planning in oil and gas construction projects

IF 6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Abdullah Alsehaimi , Ahsan Waqar , Dorin Radu , Ciprian Bratu , Hamad Almujibah , Omrane Benjeddou
{"title":"A framework for enhancing safety planning in oil and gas construction projects","authors":"Abdullah Alsehaimi ,&nbsp;Ahsan Waqar ,&nbsp;Dorin Radu ,&nbsp;Ciprian Bratu ,&nbsp;Hamad Almujibah ,&nbsp;Omrane Benjeddou","doi":"10.1016/j.asej.2024.103257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The construction and building industry is a major driver of economic growth; however, safety performance remains a key challenge. This research aimed to develop an effective framework to improve safety planning for oil and gas construction projects. A mixed methods approach was utilized, including a questionnaire survey of 167 construction practitioners and interviews with project engineers. Results showed materials/equipment factors as most significant, with “damaged equipment” having the highest RII of 0.821. The second highest factor was “poor equipment condition” (RII = 0.814), followed by “limited material transportation protections” (RII = 0.804). Among management factors, “performance pressure” scored highest (RII = 0.871), while “insufficient staffing” was lowest (RII = 0.775). For worker factors, “poor communication” ranked first (RII = 0.818) and “lack of knowledge” last (RII = 0.779). In terms of site factors, “accidents from carelessness” was predominant (RII = 0.811) but “limited workspace” was least considerable (RII = 0.768). Further statistical analysis using Spearman’s correlation coefficient showed that the perspectives of contractors, consultants, and safety/health officers had positive and significant correlations in the range of 0.35 to 0.45. This research provides empirical evidence on the most influential safety factors in oil and gas projects and proposes a practical framework for contractors and managers to improve safety planning and performance. The framework offers a proactive risk-based approach to reducing accidents and protecting workers in this hazardous industry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48648,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Engineering Journal","volume":"16 2","pages":"Article 103257"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090447924006385","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The construction and building industry is a major driver of economic growth; however, safety performance remains a key challenge. This research aimed to develop an effective framework to improve safety planning for oil and gas construction projects. A mixed methods approach was utilized, including a questionnaire survey of 167 construction practitioners and interviews with project engineers. Results showed materials/equipment factors as most significant, with “damaged equipment” having the highest RII of 0.821. The second highest factor was “poor equipment condition” (RII = 0.814), followed by “limited material transportation protections” (RII = 0.804). Among management factors, “performance pressure” scored highest (RII = 0.871), while “insufficient staffing” was lowest (RII = 0.775). For worker factors, “poor communication” ranked first (RII = 0.818) and “lack of knowledge” last (RII = 0.779). In terms of site factors, “accidents from carelessness” was predominant (RII = 0.811) but “limited workspace” was least considerable (RII = 0.768). Further statistical analysis using Spearman’s correlation coefficient showed that the perspectives of contractors, consultants, and safety/health officers had positive and significant correlations in the range of 0.35 to 0.45. This research provides empirical evidence on the most influential safety factors in oil and gas projects and proposes a practical framework for contractors and managers to improve safety planning and performance. The framework offers a proactive risk-based approach to reducing accidents and protecting workers in this hazardous industry.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Ain Shams Engineering Journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
441
审稿时长
49 weeks
期刊介绍: in Shams Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publication of peer reviewed original high-quality research papers and review papers in both traditional topics and those of emerging science and technology. Areas of both theoretical and fundamental interest as well as those concerning industrial applications, emerging instrumental techniques and those which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavor, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal are welcome. The overall focus is on original and rigorous scientific research results which have generic significance. Ain Shams Engineering Journal focuses upon aspects of mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, civil engineering, chemical engineering, petroleum engineering, environmental engineering, architectural and urban planning engineering. Papers in which knowledge from other disciplines is integrated with engineering are especially welcome like nanotechnology, material sciences, and computational methods as well as applied basic sciences: engineering mathematics, physics and chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信