The impact of donor-recipient weight ratios on outcomes after pediatric deceased donor whole-liver transplantation

Patrick B. McGeoghegan , John J. Miggins , Megan Crawford , Evert Sugarbaker , Abbas Rana
{"title":"The impact of donor-recipient weight ratios on outcomes after pediatric deceased donor whole-liver transplantation","authors":"Patrick B. McGeoghegan ,&nbsp;John J. Miggins ,&nbsp;Megan Crawford ,&nbsp;Evert Sugarbaker ,&nbsp;Abbas Rana","doi":"10.1016/j.liver.2024.100249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>It has been shown that recipients receiving grafts from both undersized and oversized donors have worse clinical outcomes. However, donor-recipient size (DR) mismatch is an understudied metric in pediatric whole-liver deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Here, we analyzed the utility of both DR weight ratio (WR) and body surface area ratio (BSAR) in predicting outcomes among all pediatric whole-liver DDLT recipients. We also performed subgroup analyses for patients with biliary atresia (BA) as well as for other diagnoses with ascites to evaluate these ratios’ utility among patients with increased abdominal domain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We evaluated all pediatric patients undergoing primary whole-liver DDLT within the UNOS database from 3/1/2002–1/23/2023. We identified 5286 patients &lt;18 years old and divided them into five groups based on increasing DR weight ratios (WRs) and body surface area ratios (BSARs) (&lt;10th percentile, 10th–20th percentile, 20th–80th percentile [reference], 80th–90th percentile, and &gt;90th percentile). Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with BA and other diagnoses with ascites. Chi-square tests were also used to compare patients with and without BA. A Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for both donor and recipient factors was used to identify associations between WR and BSAR percentiles and graft survival, patient survival, and length of stay (LOS). Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank test were used to compare each of the time-to-event outcomes among the percentiles.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In multivariable analysis, both WR and BSAR impacted clinical outcomes. However, WR remains to be explored in pediatric transplant and is easier to calculate. We therefore focused our analysis on WR.</div><div>The &lt;10th WR percentile (WR ≤ 0.70) and &gt;90th WR percentile (WR &gt; 2.0) were associated with increased hazard of graft failure and death. The &lt;10th percentile WR hazard ratio (HR) for graft survival was 1.45 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.12, 1.87, <em>p =</em> 0.004). The &gt;90th percentile WR for graft survival was 1.61 (95 % CI 1.22, 2.13, <em>p =</em> 0.001). Bottom 10th WR percentile for patient survival was 1.46 (95 % CI 1.14, 1.88, <em>p =</em> 0.01), while the &gt;90th WR for patient survival was 1.54 (95 % CI 1.28, 2.23, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Only the &gt;90th percentile WR (HR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.77, 0.96, <em>p =</em> 0.007) was associated with increased LOS.</div><div>The relationship between WR and outcomes did not hold in patients with BA or in other diagnoses with ascites (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>DR WR is a significant predictor of adverse outcomes in pediatric whole-liver DDLT recipients, and WR is a superior metric to BSAR. The utility of size-matching metrics is decreased in patients with BA or significant ascites. Transplant surgeons should exercise caution if they encounter a WR ≤ 0.70 or &gt;2.0 in pediatric whole-liver DDLT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

It has been shown that recipients receiving grafts from both undersized and oversized donors have worse clinical outcomes. However, donor-recipient size (DR) mismatch is an understudied metric in pediatric whole-liver deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Here, we analyzed the utility of both DR weight ratio (WR) and body surface area ratio (BSAR) in predicting outcomes among all pediatric whole-liver DDLT recipients. We also performed subgroup analyses for patients with biliary atresia (BA) as well as for other diagnoses with ascites to evaluate these ratios’ utility among patients with increased abdominal domain.

Methods

We evaluated all pediatric patients undergoing primary whole-liver DDLT within the UNOS database from 3/1/2002–1/23/2023. We identified 5286 patients <18 years old and divided them into five groups based on increasing DR weight ratios (WRs) and body surface area ratios (BSARs) (<10th percentile, 10th–20th percentile, 20th–80th percentile [reference], 80th–90th percentile, and >90th percentile). Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with BA and other diagnoses with ascites. Chi-square tests were also used to compare patients with and without BA. A Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for both donor and recipient factors was used to identify associations between WR and BSAR percentiles and graft survival, patient survival, and length of stay (LOS). Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank test were used to compare each of the time-to-event outcomes among the percentiles.

Results

In multivariable analysis, both WR and BSAR impacted clinical outcomes. However, WR remains to be explored in pediatric transplant and is easier to calculate. We therefore focused our analysis on WR.
The <10th WR percentile (WR ≤ 0.70) and >90th WR percentile (WR > 2.0) were associated with increased hazard of graft failure and death. The <10th percentile WR hazard ratio (HR) for graft survival was 1.45 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.12, 1.87, p = 0.004). The >90th percentile WR for graft survival was 1.61 (95 % CI 1.22, 2.13, p = 0.001). Bottom 10th WR percentile for patient survival was 1.46 (95 % CI 1.14, 1.88, p = 0.01), while the >90th WR for patient survival was 1.54 (95 % CI 1.28, 2.23, p < 0.001). Only the >90th percentile WR (HR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.77, 0.96, p = 0.007) was associated with increased LOS.
The relationship between WR and outcomes did not hold in patients with BA or in other diagnoses with ascites (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

DR WR is a significant predictor of adverse outcomes in pediatric whole-liver DDLT recipients, and WR is a superior metric to BSAR. The utility of size-matching metrics is decreased in patients with BA or significant ascites. Transplant surgeons should exercise caution if they encounter a WR ≤ 0.70 or >2.0 in pediatric whole-liver DDLT.
供体-受体体重比对儿童死亡供体全肝移植后预后的影响
研究表明,接受过小量和过大量供体移植的受者临床结果更差。然而,在儿童全肝死亡供肝移植(DDLT)中,供体-受体大小(DR)不匹配是一个尚未得到充分研究的指标。在这里,我们分析了DR体重比(WR)和体表面积比(BSAR)在预测所有儿童全肝DDLT接受者预后中的效用。我们还对胆道闭锁(BA)患者以及其他腹水诊断患者进行了亚组分析,以评估这些比率在腹部面积增加患者中的效用。方法:我们评估了2002年3月1日至2023年1月23日在UNOS数据库中接受原发性全肝DDLT的所有儿童患者。我们选取了5286例18岁的患者,并根据DR体重比(WRs)和体表面积比(bsar)的增加情况(第10百分位、第10 - 20百分位、第20 - 80百分位[文献]、第80 - 90百分位和第90百分位)将其分为5组。对BA和其他诊断为腹水的患者进行亚组分析。卡方检验也用于比较有和没有BA的患者。采用校正供体和受体因素的Cox比例风险模型来确定WR和BSAR百分位数与移植物存活、患者存活和住院时间(LOS)之间的关系。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和log-rank检验比较各百分位数间的时间到事件结果。结果在多变量分析中,WR和BSAR对临床结果均有影响。然而,在儿科移植中,WR仍有待探索,并且更容易计算。因此,我们将分析重点放在WR上。第10个WR百分位数(WR≤0.70)和第90个WR百分位数(WR >;2.0)与移植物衰竭和死亡风险增加相关。第10百分位WR风险比(HR)为1.45(95%可信区间[CI] 1.12, 1.87, p = 0.004)。移植瘤存活的第90百分位WR为1.61 (95% CI 1.22, 2.13, p = 0.001)。患者生存的第10个WR百分位数为1.46 (95% CI 1.14, 1.88, p = 0.01),而患者生存的第90个WR百分位数为1.54 (95% CI 1.28, 2.23, p <;0.001)。只有第90百分位WR (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77, 0.96, p = 0.007)与LOS增加相关。在BA患者或其他诊断为腹水的患者中,WR与预后之间的关系不成立(p >;0.05)。结论WR是儿童全肝DDLT受者不良结局的重要预测指标,WR优于BSAR。在BA或严重腹水患者中,尺寸匹配指标的效用降低。如果移植外科医生在儿童全肝DDLT中遇到WR≤0.70或>;2.0,则应谨慎行事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信