Understanding determinants of preferences for autonomous vehicles in the global south: Private, shared, or pooled rides in Bangkok, Thailand

IF 3.9 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Phathinan Thaithatkul , Saksith Chalermpong , Lisa Kenney , Apiwat Ratanawaraha
{"title":"Understanding determinants of preferences for autonomous vehicles in the global south: Private, shared, or pooled rides in Bangkok, Thailand","authors":"Phathinan Thaithatkul ,&nbsp;Saksith Chalermpong ,&nbsp;Lisa Kenney ,&nbsp;Apiwat Ratanawaraha","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The effects of AVs on cities remain uncertain but will ultimately be shaped by the predominant service model—either private ownership or shared usage. People’s decisions about which one to use are based in part on individual perceptions and preferences. To date, there have been only a handful of studies on AV preferences from the Global South, yet these countries may benefit greatly from AVs, but they also present a unique set of challenges for implementation. This study therefore fills some important research gaps about understanding preferences across different AV service models (i.e., privately owned AVs vs. shared AVs) and ride types (i.e., solo vs. pooled rides). From our stated preference research in Bangkok, Thailand our respondents show somewhat low interest in AVs overall, but we also found that men, people with higher incomes, and those who currently travel by private vehicles and those who use public transport all show more interest in privately-owned AVs over shared AVs (SAVs). However, being a public transport user increases interest in pooled SAVs, and income was not a significant effect on interest in SAVs. Our study revealed that people interested in SAVs would also be interested in pooled ride SAVs, and vice versa. These results can help inform policy and regulatory areas that need to be addressed for sustainable, accessible and inclusive AV implementation in Thailand. We also discuss the broader implications for future research about AV preferences in the Global South.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 101290"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224002768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effects of AVs on cities remain uncertain but will ultimately be shaped by the predominant service model—either private ownership or shared usage. People’s decisions about which one to use are based in part on individual perceptions and preferences. To date, there have been only a handful of studies on AV preferences from the Global South, yet these countries may benefit greatly from AVs, but they also present a unique set of challenges for implementation. This study therefore fills some important research gaps about understanding preferences across different AV service models (i.e., privately owned AVs vs. shared AVs) and ride types (i.e., solo vs. pooled rides). From our stated preference research in Bangkok, Thailand our respondents show somewhat low interest in AVs overall, but we also found that men, people with higher incomes, and those who currently travel by private vehicles and those who use public transport all show more interest in privately-owned AVs over shared AVs (SAVs). However, being a public transport user increases interest in pooled SAVs, and income was not a significant effect on interest in SAVs. Our study revealed that people interested in SAVs would also be interested in pooled ride SAVs, and vice versa. These results can help inform policy and regulatory areas that need to be addressed for sustainable, accessible and inclusive AV implementation in Thailand. We also discuss the broader implications for future research about AV preferences in the Global South.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信