Talking with pregnant women exposed to cannabis use after cannabis legalization: Experiences of professionals working in Québec's social and healthcare system

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Karen A. Dominguez-Cancino , Rose Chabot , Yolaine Frossard de Saugy , Kristelle Alunni-Menichini , Lysiane Robidoux-Léonard , Genève Guilbert-Gauthier , Karine Bertrand , Christophe Huỳnh , Pablo Martínez , Helen-Maria Vasiliadis , Nadia L'Espérance , Victoria Massamba , Julie Loslier , José Ignacio Nazif-Munoz
{"title":"Talking with pregnant women exposed to cannabis use after cannabis legalization: Experiences of professionals working in Québec's social and healthcare system","authors":"Karen A. Dominguez-Cancino ,&nbsp;Rose Chabot ,&nbsp;Yolaine Frossard de Saugy ,&nbsp;Kristelle Alunni-Menichini ,&nbsp;Lysiane Robidoux-Léonard ,&nbsp;Genève Guilbert-Gauthier ,&nbsp;Karine Bertrand ,&nbsp;Christophe Huỳnh ,&nbsp;Pablo Martínez ,&nbsp;Helen-Maria Vasiliadis ,&nbsp;Nadia L'Espérance ,&nbsp;Victoria Massamba ,&nbsp;Julie Loslier ,&nbsp;José Ignacio Nazif-Munoz","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The rising prevalence of prenatal cannabis use in high-income countries presents a growing concern for the medical community. Despite guidelines outlining risks, healthcare and social service professionals often struggle to discuss cannabis use with pregnant women. This study examines how these interactions have evolved following the Cannabis Act in Québec, focusing on how professionals respond to and provide guidance for women who report cannabis use during pregnancy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Purposeful sampling was employed to recruit 19 professionals, including physicians, nurses, psychologists, and social workers. Data was analyzed using King's (2012) Template analysis technique.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified three themes: a) how professionals talk about cannabis, b) what they talk about, and c) what practices they follow. Two key processes—i) exploration and assessment, and ii) action—were identified. Professionals tailor interventions, including counseling, psycho-emotional management, harm reduction, and referrals, based on risk levels and willingness to change. We observed differences among professionals based on the programs in which they work.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study highlights the complex interactions between health professionals and pregnant women who use cannabis. It discusses the importance of integrating harm reduction strategies with person-centered approaches to address cannabis use. While professionals balance the need for openness with concerns about fetal health, a knowledge gap persists. Strengthening educational initiatives and expanding addiction expertise could enhance support and intervention practices, bridging gaps left by current evidence and regulatory frameworks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100524"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The rising prevalence of prenatal cannabis use in high-income countries presents a growing concern for the medical community. Despite guidelines outlining risks, healthcare and social service professionals often struggle to discuss cannabis use with pregnant women. This study examines how these interactions have evolved following the Cannabis Act in Québec, focusing on how professionals respond to and provide guidance for women who report cannabis use during pregnancy.

Methods

This is a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Purposeful sampling was employed to recruit 19 professionals, including physicians, nurses, psychologists, and social workers. Data was analyzed using King's (2012) Template analysis technique.

Results

We identified three themes: a) how professionals talk about cannabis, b) what they talk about, and c) what practices they follow. Two key processes—i) exploration and assessment, and ii) action—were identified. Professionals tailor interventions, including counseling, psycho-emotional management, harm reduction, and referrals, based on risk levels and willingness to change. We observed differences among professionals based on the programs in which they work.

Conclusions

This study highlights the complex interactions between health professionals and pregnant women who use cannabis. It discusses the importance of integrating harm reduction strategies with person-centered approaches to address cannabis use. While professionals balance the need for openness with concerns about fetal health, a knowledge gap persists. Strengthening educational initiatives and expanding addiction expertise could enhance support and intervention practices, bridging gaps left by current evidence and regulatory frameworks.
与大麻合法化后接触大麻的孕妇交谈:在古巴社会和医疗保健系统工作的专业人员的经验
在高收入国家,产前使用大麻的流行率不断上升,这引起了医学界越来越多的关注。尽管指导方针概述了风险,但保健和社会服务专业人员往往难以与孕妇讨论大麻的使用。本研究考察了在《大麻法》颁布后,这些相互作用是如何演变的,重点是专业人员如何回应并为报告怀孕期间使用大麻的妇女提供指导。方法采用半结构化访谈法进行定性研究。采用有目的的抽样方法,招募了19名专业人员,包括医生、护士、心理学家和社会工作者。数据分析使用King's(2012)模板分析技术。结果我们确定了三个主题:a)专业人士如何谈论大麻,b)他们谈论什么,c)他们遵循什么做法。确定了两个关键过程:一)探索和评估,二)行动。专业人员根据风险水平和改变的意愿量身定制干预措施,包括咨询、心理情绪管理、减少伤害和转诊。我们观察到专业人士之间的差异是基于他们工作的项目。结论:本研究强调了卫生专业人员与使用大麻的孕妇之间复杂的相互作用。它讨论了将减少危害战略与以人为本的方法结合起来解决大麻使用问题的重要性。虽然专业人士在公开需求和对胎儿健康的担忧之间取得了平衡,但知识差距仍然存在。加强教育举措和扩大成瘾专业知识可以加强支持和干预做法,弥合现有证据和监管框架留下的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信