Reflexology evidence map

IF 1.7 Q2 Medicine
Erika Cardozo Pereira , Caio Fabio Schlechta Portella , Ricardo Ghelman , Carmen Verônica Mendes Abdala , Ana Cláudia Moraes Barros Leite-Mor , Arthur Schveitzer Ferreira , Pamela Gissi Lima , Mariana Cabral Schveitzer
{"title":"Reflexology evidence map","authors":"Erika Cardozo Pereira ,&nbsp;Caio Fabio Schlechta Portella ,&nbsp;Ricardo Ghelman ,&nbsp;Carmen Verônica Mendes Abdala ,&nbsp;Ana Cláudia Moraes Barros Leite-Mor ,&nbsp;Arthur Schveitzer Ferreira ,&nbsp;Pamela Gissi Lima ,&nbsp;Mariana Cabral Schveitzer","doi":"10.1016/j.aimed.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This evidence map describes Reflexology intervention research reporting health outcomes. Reflexology is a complementary therapy that performs the manipulation of points or areas under the skin known as reflex points, found in specific areas of the body, such as ears, hands and feet.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This evidence map is based on the 3iE evidence gap map methodology. We searched three electronic databases from inception to April 2024 and included systematic reviews only. Systematic reviews were analyzed based on AMSTAR 2. We used tableau to graphically display confidence level, number of reviews, outcomes and a broad estimate of effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This map is based on 34 systematic reviews. Most of the reviews were published in the last ten years. The foot reflexology was the most researched intervention. Reflexology was evaluated as an intervention in several health outcomes, resulting in the following confidence levels: 4 high, 4 moderate, 3 low and 23 critically low. Every outcome effect was classified: 2 as negative; 33 as no effect; 24 as mixed; 1 as potential positive and 55 as positive. The outcomes were divided into three major groups: physical and metabolic effects; vitality, well-being and quality of life; and mental health, physical and metabolically effects were the most common outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Reflexology has been applied in different areas and this Evidence Map provides an easy visualization of valuable information for patients, health practitioners and managers, to promote evidence-based complementary therapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7343,"journal":{"name":"Advances in integrative medicine","volume":"11 4","pages":"Pages 191-197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in integrative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958824000909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This evidence map describes Reflexology intervention research reporting health outcomes. Reflexology is a complementary therapy that performs the manipulation of points or areas under the skin known as reflex points, found in specific areas of the body, such as ears, hands and feet.

Methods

This evidence map is based on the 3iE evidence gap map methodology. We searched three electronic databases from inception to April 2024 and included systematic reviews only. Systematic reviews were analyzed based on AMSTAR 2. We used tableau to graphically display confidence level, number of reviews, outcomes and a broad estimate of effectiveness.

Results

This map is based on 34 systematic reviews. Most of the reviews were published in the last ten years. The foot reflexology was the most researched intervention. Reflexology was evaluated as an intervention in several health outcomes, resulting in the following confidence levels: 4 high, 4 moderate, 3 low and 23 critically low. Every outcome effect was classified: 2 as negative; 33 as no effect; 24 as mixed; 1 as potential positive and 55 as positive. The outcomes were divided into three major groups: physical and metabolic effects; vitality, well-being and quality of life; and mental health, physical and metabolically effects were the most common outcomes.

Conclusions

Reflexology has been applied in different areas and this Evidence Map provides an easy visualization of valuable information for patients, health practitioners and managers, to promote evidence-based complementary therapies.
反射疗法证据图
本证据图描述了反射疗法干预研究报告的健康结果。反射疗法是一种辅助疗法,对身体特定部位(如耳朵、手和脚)的皮肤下被称为反射点的点或区域进行操作。方法本证据图基于3iE证据缺口图方法。我们检索了从成立到2024年4月的三个电子数据库,仅包括系统评价。基于AMSTAR 2进行系统评价分析。我们使用表格以图形方式显示置信度、评估数量、结果和对有效性的广泛估计。结果本图基于34篇系统综述。大多数评论都是最近十年发表的。足部反射是研究最多的干预措施。反射疗法被评估为几种健康结果的干预措施,产生以下置信水平:4个高,4个中等,3个低和23个极低。每个结果效应分为:2为负面;33 .没有效果;24 .混合;1是潜在的正数55是正数。结果分为三大类:生理和代谢效应;活力、幸福和生活质量;心理健康、身体和代谢影响是最常见的结果。结论反射疗法已在不同领域得到应用,该证据图谱为患者、医疗从业者和管理者提供了一种方便的有价值信息可视化,以促进循证补充疗法的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in integrative medicine
Advances in integrative medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Integrative Medicine (AIMED) is an international peer-reviewed, evidence-based research and review journal that is multi-disciplinary within the fields of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. The journal focuses on rigorous quantitative and qualitative research including systematic reviews, clinical trials and surveys, whilst also welcoming medical hypotheses and clinically-relevant articles and case studies disclosing practical learning tools for the consulting practitioner. By promoting research and practice excellence in the field, and cross collaboration between relevant practitioner groups and associations, the journal aims to advance the practice of IM, identify areas for future research, and improve patient health outcomes. International networking is encouraged through clinical innovation, the establishment of best practice and by providing opportunities for cooperation between organisations and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信