Madelyn daSilva , Sameth Taro Hang , Shannon L. Sibbald
{"title":"Living documents: A longitudinal data collection method for health services research","authors":"Madelyn daSilva , Sameth Taro Hang , Shannon L. Sibbald","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Qualitative research tools offer health sciences researchers the ability to understand complex, varied, and nuanced facets of an individual's lived experiences. Several of these tools include observations, interviews, and focus groups, each with its own advantages and limitations. We created an alternative tool, the Living Document, an iterative, longitudinal, open-ended, and adaptable questionnaire that overcomes the barriers presented by other qualitative research tools. The Living Documents allows researchers to better understand and familiarize themselves with the research context, understand change over time, and capture the perspectives of research participants. As a proof of concept, the Living Document was employed within a chronic disease program embedded within primary care called the Best Care COPD (BCC) program to better understand its growth and implementation in new patient sites. Given the iterative and sequential nature of the tool employed within the BCC program, its compatibility with other data collection tools, and its longitudinal use, the Living Document was shown to be a valuable tool for the field of health sciences and for implementation research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100513"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524001227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Qualitative research tools offer health sciences researchers the ability to understand complex, varied, and nuanced facets of an individual's lived experiences. Several of these tools include observations, interviews, and focus groups, each with its own advantages and limitations. We created an alternative tool, the Living Document, an iterative, longitudinal, open-ended, and adaptable questionnaire that overcomes the barriers presented by other qualitative research tools. The Living Documents allows researchers to better understand and familiarize themselves with the research context, understand change over time, and capture the perspectives of research participants. As a proof of concept, the Living Document was employed within a chronic disease program embedded within primary care called the Best Care COPD (BCC) program to better understand its growth and implementation in new patient sites. Given the iterative and sequential nature of the tool employed within the BCC program, its compatibility with other data collection tools, and its longitudinal use, the Living Document was shown to be a valuable tool for the field of health sciences and for implementation research.
定性研究工具为健康科学研究人员提供了理解个人生活经历的复杂、多样和微妙方面的能力。其中一些工具包括观察、访谈和焦点小组,每种工具都有自己的优点和局限性。我们创建了一个可替代的工具,活文档,一个迭代的,纵向的,开放式的,适应性强的问卷,克服了其他定性研究工具所存在的障碍。生活文件使研究人员能够更好地了解和熟悉研究背景,了解随时间的变化,并捕捉研究参与者的观点。作为一种概念验证,《生活文件》被用于初级保健中一个名为“最佳慢性阻塞性肺病护理”(Best care COPD, BCC)的慢性病项目,以更好地了解该项目在新患者地区的发展和实施情况。鉴于BCC计划中使用的工具的迭代和顺序性质,它与其他数据收集工具的兼容性,以及它的纵向使用,活体文件被证明是健康科学领域和实施研究的宝贵工具。