Doctor-patient communication in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Insights from the LupusVoice study

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Esther Rodríguez Almaraz , Tarek Carlos Salman-Monte , Jaime Calvo-Alen , Ma Julia Barbado Ajo , José María Álvaro-Gracia Álvaro , Pilar Bernabeu , Joaquín Borrás Blasco , Silvia Pérez Ortega , Raül Rubio Renau , Carlota Solà Marsiñach , Marta Galvez-Fernandez , Noemí Bahamontes-Rosa , Joaquín Sánchez-Covisa Hernández , Maria Galindo Izquierdo
{"title":"Doctor-patient communication in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Insights from the LupusVoice study","authors":"Esther Rodríguez Almaraz ,&nbsp;Tarek Carlos Salman-Monte ,&nbsp;Jaime Calvo-Alen ,&nbsp;Ma Julia Barbado Ajo ,&nbsp;José María Álvaro-Gracia Álvaro ,&nbsp;Pilar Bernabeu ,&nbsp;Joaquín Borrás Blasco ,&nbsp;Silvia Pérez Ortega ,&nbsp;Raül Rubio Renau ,&nbsp;Carlota Solà Marsiñach ,&nbsp;Marta Galvez-Fernandez ,&nbsp;Noemí Bahamontes-Rosa ,&nbsp;Joaquín Sánchez-Covisa Hernández ,&nbsp;Maria Galindo Izquierdo","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Good quality doctor-patient interactions foster patient involvement and increase trust, treatment satisfaction and adherence. However, what constitutes optimal doctor-patient communication in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is unclear. This study aimed to identify gaps in the communication between clinicians and SLE patients. The LupusVoice Study was a qualitative, descriptive, observational, multicenter, and cross-sectional ethnographic study including the experiences of 40 patients with SLE, and the perceptions of 9 SLE specialized clinicians, from six different hospitals in Spain, collected through interviews and analyzed through thematic analysis. This study identified gaps in doctor-patient communication in four areas: diagnosis, pharmacological treatment, non-pharmacological strategies, and pregnancy. Patients were not satisfied with the communication of the diagnosis, aiming to receive more information about SLE and its impact on quality of life in a realistic and tactful manner. Suboptimal communication was mainly explained by clinicians’ lack of time. Regarding pharmacological treatment, patients wanted to have known more about the side-effects, not reported by clinicians due to time constraints and fear of non-adherence. Concerning non-pharmacological measures, doctors did not provide information about diet due to skepticism about its benefits and did not usually address psychological problems. Regarding pregnancy, while patients missed earlier and more detailed family planning counselling, clinicians only offered it when women manifested their desire to conceive. To improve SLE patients’ experiences, efforts should be made towards increasing awareness of communication gaps among HCPs while supporting them in communication delivery with the figure of a specialized nurse.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100528"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266732152500006X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Good quality doctor-patient interactions foster patient involvement and increase trust, treatment satisfaction and adherence. However, what constitutes optimal doctor-patient communication in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is unclear. This study aimed to identify gaps in the communication between clinicians and SLE patients. The LupusVoice Study was a qualitative, descriptive, observational, multicenter, and cross-sectional ethnographic study including the experiences of 40 patients with SLE, and the perceptions of 9 SLE specialized clinicians, from six different hospitals in Spain, collected through interviews and analyzed through thematic analysis. This study identified gaps in doctor-patient communication in four areas: diagnosis, pharmacological treatment, non-pharmacological strategies, and pregnancy. Patients were not satisfied with the communication of the diagnosis, aiming to receive more information about SLE and its impact on quality of life in a realistic and tactful manner. Suboptimal communication was mainly explained by clinicians’ lack of time. Regarding pharmacological treatment, patients wanted to have known more about the side-effects, not reported by clinicians due to time constraints and fear of non-adherence. Concerning non-pharmacological measures, doctors did not provide information about diet due to skepticism about its benefits and did not usually address psychological problems. Regarding pregnancy, while patients missed earlier and more detailed family planning counselling, clinicians only offered it when women manifested their desire to conceive. To improve SLE patients’ experiences, efforts should be made towards increasing awareness of communication gaps among HCPs while supporting them in communication delivery with the figure of a specialized nurse.

Abstract Image

系统性红斑狼疮的医患沟通:来自LupusVoice研究的见解
良好的医患互动促进患者参与,增加信任、治疗满意度和依从性。然而,在系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)中,什么是最佳的医患沟通尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定临床医生与SLE患者之间沟通的差距。LupusVoice研究是一项定性、描述性、观察性、多中心、横断面的人种学研究,包括40名SLE患者的经历,以及来自西班牙6家不同医院的9名SLE专业临床医生的看法,通过访谈收集并通过主题分析进行分析。这项研究确定了医患沟通在四个方面的差距:诊断、药物治疗、非药物策略和妊娠。患者对诊断沟通不满意,旨在以现实和委婉的方式获得更多关于SLE及其对生活质量影响的信息。沟通不佳的主要原因是临床医生缺乏时间。关于药物治疗,患者希望了解更多的副作用,由于时间限制和担心不依从性,临床医生没有报告。在非药物措施方面,由于对饮食的益处持怀疑态度,医生没有提供有关饮食的信息,而且通常没有解决心理问题。在怀孕方面,虽然患者错过了更早、更详细的计划生育咨询,但临床医生只在女性表现出怀孕愿望时才提供咨询。为了改善SLE患者的体验,应努力提高医护人员对沟通差距的认识,同时支持他们以专业护士的身份进行沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信