Complex versus simple suicides in Northern Tunisia: A 17 years autopsy-based study

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Ikram Kort , Khaled Bchir , Mohamed Belleli , Ons Hmandi , Syrine Mannoubi , Mohamed Allouche
{"title":"Complex versus simple suicides in Northern Tunisia: A 17 years autopsy-based study","authors":"Ikram Kort ,&nbsp;Khaled Bchir ,&nbsp;Mohamed Belleli ,&nbsp;Ons Hmandi ,&nbsp;Syrine Mannoubi ,&nbsp;Mohamed Allouche","doi":"10.1016/j.jflm.2025.102827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Complex suicide, whether planned or unplanned, presents significant challenges for forensic specialists and judicial authorities. Although rare, each case requires a thorough examination of both the body and the scene of death.</div><div>This study aims to analyze the pattern of complex suicide victims in northern Tunisia, comparing them with simple suicide cases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective observational study with retrospective data collection. We included all cases of simple and complex suicides, autopsied at the Department of Legal Medicine of Tunis, from 2005 to 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 72 complex suicides (3.3 % of 2153 suicide fatalities) were identified, with 35 planned and 37 unplanned complex suicides. Males represented 77.8 % of the cases and their mean age was 42.2 ± 15 years. A history of mental illness was reported in 31.9 %. Two suicide methods were used in 93.1 % of cases. The most frequent combination was poisoning and hanging (29.2 %), followed by drowning and falling from a height (12.5 %). The most common single methods were hanging (48.6 %), poisoning (55.6 %), sharp force (31.9 %), and fall from a height (25.0 %). The latter three methods were significantly higher than simple suicides (p &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Complex suicide is infrequent and presents significant investigative challenges. A detailed analysis of the victim's background, an on-site inspection of the scene, reconstruction of the events, and a complete autopsy are essential to determine the cause and manner of death.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic and legal medicine","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 102827"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic and legal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X25000289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Complex suicide, whether planned or unplanned, presents significant challenges for forensic specialists and judicial authorities. Although rare, each case requires a thorough examination of both the body and the scene of death.
This study aims to analyze the pattern of complex suicide victims in northern Tunisia, comparing them with simple suicide cases.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study with retrospective data collection. We included all cases of simple and complex suicides, autopsied at the Department of Legal Medicine of Tunis, from 2005 to 2021.

Results

In total, 72 complex suicides (3.3 % of 2153 suicide fatalities) were identified, with 35 planned and 37 unplanned complex suicides. Males represented 77.8 % of the cases and their mean age was 42.2 ± 15 years. A history of mental illness was reported in 31.9 %. Two suicide methods were used in 93.1 % of cases. The most frequent combination was poisoning and hanging (29.2 %), followed by drowning and falling from a height (12.5 %). The most common single methods were hanging (48.6 %), poisoning (55.6 %), sharp force (31.9 %), and fall from a height (25.0 %). The latter three methods were significantly higher than simple suicides (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Complex suicide is infrequent and presents significant investigative challenges. A detailed analysis of the victim's background, an on-site inspection of the scene, reconstruction of the events, and a complete autopsy are essential to determine the cause and manner of death.
突尼斯北部复杂自杀与简单自杀:一项为期17年的基于尸体解剖的研究
复杂的自杀,无论是有计划的还是计划外的,都给法医专家和司法当局带来了重大挑战。虽然罕见,但每个案件都需要对尸体和死亡现场进行彻底的检查。本研究旨在分析突尼斯北部复杂自杀受害者的模式,并将其与简单自杀案件进行比较。方法回顾性观察性研究,回顾性资料收集。我们纳入了2005年至2021年在突尼斯法医学部门尸检的所有简单和复杂自杀病例。结果共发现复杂自杀72例(占2153例自杀死亡人数的3.3%),其中计划自杀35例,计划外自杀37例。男性占77.8%,平均年龄42.2±15岁。31.9%的人有精神病史。两种自杀方式占93.1%。最常见的组合是中毒和上吊(29.2%),其次是溺水和跳楼(12.5%)。最常见的单一方式为上吊(48.6%)、投毒(55.6%)、利器(31.9%)和高空坠落(25.0%)。后三种方法的自杀率显著高于单纯自杀(p <;0.001)。结论复合性自杀并不常见,且存在重大的调查挑战。对受害人的背景进行详细分析,对现场进行检查,对事件进行重建,并进行完整的尸检,对于确定死因和死亡方式至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine publishes topical articles on aspects of forensic and legal medicine. Specifically the Journal supports research that explores the medical principles of care and forensic assessment of individuals, whether adult or child, in contact with the judicial system. It is a fully peer-review hybrid journal with a broad international perspective. The Journal accepts submissions of original research, review articles, and pertinent case studies, editorials, and commentaries in relevant areas of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Context of Practice, and Education and Training. The Journal adheres to strict publication ethical guidelines, and actively supports a culture of inclusive and representative publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信