Responsibility, resentment, and red tape: Exploring stigma experiences among assistance program users in Missouri

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
A. Terhaar , E.K. Barnidge , M. Somheil , H. Bednarek
{"title":"Responsibility, resentment, and red tape: Exploring stigma experiences among assistance program users in Missouri","authors":"A. Terhaar ,&nbsp;E.K. Barnidge ,&nbsp;M. Somheil ,&nbsp;H. Bednarek","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Although assistance programs (i.e. Medicaid, SNAP, and food pantries) are proven to ensure access to necessary resources and improve health outcomes, evidence shows that participants experience stigma due to their participation in these programs, creating barriers to participation and further marginalization of low-income families. In the U.S., welfare stigma is rooted in values of personal responsibility that perpetuate harmful stereotypes about assistance users. Internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma are manifestations of stigma that may be experienced by assistance users.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>One-on-one, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a geographically stratified sample of adult Medicaid participants in Missouri (n = 72). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using inductive and deductive coding. Thematic content analysis was employed to derive and report the main themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among our sample, internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma were experienced through the value of personal responsibility, program design and implementation, and program utilization. Through the value of personal responsibility, participants shared feelings of shame related to using public assistance (internalized stigma) and exceptionalism when comparing themselves to other users of public assistance (interpersonal stigma). Within program implementation, participants reported the prejudice they experienced through interactions with programmatic staff (interpersonal stigma) and described experiencing administrative barriers to accessing programs (structural stigma). Lastly, participants discussed how stigma influenced their utilization of public assistance programs, including decisions to enroll and engage in programs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study adds to existing understanding about how assistance users experience stigma and how internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma impact assistance program uptake and utilization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100511"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321524001203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although assistance programs (i.e. Medicaid, SNAP, and food pantries) are proven to ensure access to necessary resources and improve health outcomes, evidence shows that participants experience stigma due to their participation in these programs, creating barriers to participation and further marginalization of low-income families. In the U.S., welfare stigma is rooted in values of personal responsibility that perpetuate harmful stereotypes about assistance users. Internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma are manifestations of stigma that may be experienced by assistance users.

Methods

One-on-one, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a geographically stratified sample of adult Medicaid participants in Missouri (n = 72). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using inductive and deductive coding. Thematic content analysis was employed to derive and report the main themes.

Results

Among our sample, internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma were experienced through the value of personal responsibility, program design and implementation, and program utilization. Through the value of personal responsibility, participants shared feelings of shame related to using public assistance (internalized stigma) and exceptionalism when comparing themselves to other users of public assistance (interpersonal stigma). Within program implementation, participants reported the prejudice they experienced through interactions with programmatic staff (interpersonal stigma) and described experiencing administrative barriers to accessing programs (structural stigma). Lastly, participants discussed how stigma influenced their utilization of public assistance programs, including decisions to enroll and engage in programs.

Conclusion

Our study adds to existing understanding about how assistance users experience stigma and how internalized, interpersonal, and structural stigma impact assistance program uptake and utilization.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信