We’ll always have Paris? Spatial inequalities and the rise of political discontent in the metropolitan region of Paris

IF 1.7 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Tania Fernández García , André Torre , Fernando Rubiera Morollón
{"title":"We’ll always have Paris? Spatial inequalities and the rise of political discontent in the metropolitan region of Paris","authors":"Tania Fernández García ,&nbsp;André Torre ,&nbsp;Fernando Rubiera Morollón","doi":"10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent decades, developed economies have experienced a strong concentration of economic activity around their main metropolises, generating economic and social fractures between these prosperous areas and the rest of the country. Several contributions in the literature on the ‘geography of discontent’ noted how the concentration of growth and prosperity in large metropolitan areas explains the rise of anti-system, anti-European political options. This paper focuses on the case of Paris and its surrounding region, Île-de-France, using the results of the last French presidential election in April 2022. Two candidates, one who embodied the Europeanist and pro-establishment option (Macron) and the populist option (Le Pen), faced each other in the second round of the election. This situation, combined with the high level of spatial disaggregation of socioeconomic information within the French statistical system, makes it possible to study the relationship between spatial inequalities and political discontent at the local level and analyse intra-metropolitan patterns. Inequalities at this scale explain a large part of the anti-establishment vote: the most prosperous areas tend to vote for the pro-establishment option, whereas populism becomes strong in the less favoured areas. Stagnating areas also have a greater propensity to support populist political parties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45520,"journal":{"name":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"Article 100157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224003688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent decades, developed economies have experienced a strong concentration of economic activity around their main metropolises, generating economic and social fractures between these prosperous areas and the rest of the country. Several contributions in the literature on the ‘geography of discontent’ noted how the concentration of growth and prosperity in large metropolitan areas explains the rise of anti-system, anti-European political options. This paper focuses on the case of Paris and its surrounding region, Île-de-France, using the results of the last French presidential election in April 2022. Two candidates, one who embodied the Europeanist and pro-establishment option (Macron) and the populist option (Le Pen), faced each other in the second round of the election. This situation, combined with the high level of spatial disaggregation of socioeconomic information within the French statistical system, makes it possible to study the relationship between spatial inequalities and political discontent at the local level and analyse intra-metropolitan patterns. Inequalities at this scale explain a large part of the anti-establishment vote: the most prosperous areas tend to vote for the pro-establishment option, whereas populism becomes strong in the less favoured areas. Stagnating areas also have a greater propensity to support populist political parties.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Regional Science Policy & Practice (RSPP) is the official policy and practitioner orientated journal of the Regional Science Association International. It is an international journal that publishes high quality papers in applied regional science that explore policy and practice issues in regional and local development. It welcomes papers from a range of academic disciplines and practitioners including planning, public policy, geography, economics and environmental science and related fields. Papers should address the interface between academic debates and policy development and application. RSPP provides an opportunity for academics and policy makers to develop a dialogue to identify and explore many of the challenges facing local and regional economies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信