Impact of Flexor Tendon Traction Tenolysis on Clinical Outcomes in Open A1 Pulley Release for Trigger Finger

Q3 Medicine
Shalimar Abdullah BMBS, MS , Syed Jeffrey Syed Ahmad Kabeer MBChB, MD , Lim Chia Hua MD , Jamari Sapuan MD, MS , Parminder Singh Gill MBBS, MS , Elaine Soh Zi Fan MBBS, MD
{"title":"Impact of Flexor Tendon Traction Tenolysis on Clinical Outcomes in Open A1 Pulley Release for Trigger Finger","authors":"Shalimar Abdullah BMBS, MS ,&nbsp;Syed Jeffrey Syed Ahmad Kabeer MBChB, MD ,&nbsp;Lim Chia Hua MD ,&nbsp;Jamari Sapuan MD, MS ,&nbsp;Parminder Singh Gill MBBS, MS ,&nbsp;Elaine Soh Zi Fan MBBS, MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aims to compare the postoperative clinical outcomes of open A1 pulley release with and without flexor tendon traction tenolysis. Outcomes assessed include finger range of motion, hand function (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [<em>Quick</em>DASH] score), complications (eg, digital nerve injury, superficial infection, and residual trigger finger), and surgery duration.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective study was conducted from January 2018 to June 2019, involving patients with grade II–III trigger finger requiring surgical intervention. Patients were randomized into two groups: group I (open A1 pulley release with flexor tendon traction tenolysis) and group II (open A1 pulley release without flexor tendon traction tenolysis). Postoperative assessments were conducted at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 4 months, documenting finger range of motion, <em>Quick</em>DASH scores, complications, and surgery duration.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 50 patients met the selection criteria, with 46 completing the study. The majority were women, with an average age of 56 ± 9.6 years. The patients were predominantly diabetic with the condition affecting the left hand and middle finger and presenting as grade III trigger finger. Baseline characteristics, including age, gender (female/male), ethnicity, occupational status, diabetes status, and trigger finger severity, were comparable between the two groups. Preoperative <em>Quick</em>DASH scores were also similar. The mean preoperative finger range of motion at the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joint were lower in group I but were not statistically important. Patients in group I exhibited consistently better postoperative finger range of motion and <em>Quick</em>DASH scores compared to group II throughout the follow-up period. The difference was statistically important at the 2-week follow-up. Although group I continued to show better outcomes at 2 and 4 months, the differences were not statistically important. Surgery duration was importantly longer in group I (16.4 ± 5.7 minutes) compared to group II (11.43 ± 3.8 minutes). Two patients in group I experienced wound infections, which resolved with a week-long course of antibiotics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Open A1 pulley release with flexor tendon traction tenolysis resulted in better early postoperative (2 weeks) finger flexion range of motion and <em>Quick</em>DASH scores, albeit with a longer surgery duration.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic Ib.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 1","pages":"Pages 56-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514124001981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to compare the postoperative clinical outcomes of open A1 pulley release with and without flexor tendon traction tenolysis. Outcomes assessed include finger range of motion, hand function (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [QuickDASH] score), complications (eg, digital nerve injury, superficial infection, and residual trigger finger), and surgery duration.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted from January 2018 to June 2019, involving patients with grade II–III trigger finger requiring surgical intervention. Patients were randomized into two groups: group I (open A1 pulley release with flexor tendon traction tenolysis) and group II (open A1 pulley release without flexor tendon traction tenolysis). Postoperative assessments were conducted at 2 weeks, 2 months, and 4 months, documenting finger range of motion, QuickDASH scores, complications, and surgery duration.

Results

A total of 50 patients met the selection criteria, with 46 completing the study. The majority were women, with an average age of 56 ± 9.6 years. The patients were predominantly diabetic with the condition affecting the left hand and middle finger and presenting as grade III trigger finger. Baseline characteristics, including age, gender (female/male), ethnicity, occupational status, diabetes status, and trigger finger severity, were comparable between the two groups. Preoperative QuickDASH scores were also similar. The mean preoperative finger range of motion at the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joint were lower in group I but were not statistically important. Patients in group I exhibited consistently better postoperative finger range of motion and QuickDASH scores compared to group II throughout the follow-up period. The difference was statistically important at the 2-week follow-up. Although group I continued to show better outcomes at 2 and 4 months, the differences were not statistically important. Surgery duration was importantly longer in group I (16.4 ± 5.7 minutes) compared to group II (11.43 ± 3.8 minutes). Two patients in group I experienced wound infections, which resolved with a week-long course of antibiotics.

Conclusions

Open A1 pulley release with flexor tendon traction tenolysis resulted in better early postoperative (2 weeks) finger flexion range of motion and QuickDASH scores, albeit with a longer surgery duration.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic Ib.
屈肌腱牵引松解术对扳机指开放式A1滑轮松解术临床疗效的影响
目的本研究旨在比较开放A1滑轮松解伴和不伴屈肌腱牵引松解的术后临床效果。评估的结果包括手指活动范围、手部功能(手臂、肩部和手部残疾[QuickDASH]评分)、并发症(如指神经损伤、浅表感染和残余扳机指)和手术时间。方法2018年1月至2019年6月进行前瞻性研究,纳入II-III级触发指需要手术干预的患者。患者随机分为两组:I组(开放A1滑轮松解伴屈肌腱牵引松解)和II组(开放A1滑轮松解伴屈肌腱牵引松解)。术后评估分别在2周、2个月和4个月进行,记录手指活动范围、QuickDASH评分、并发症和手术时间。结果50例患者符合入选标准,其中46例完成研究。以女性居多,平均年龄56±9.6岁。患者以糖尿病为主,累及左手和中指,表现为III级扳机指。基线特征,包括年龄、性别(女性/男性)、种族、职业状况、糖尿病状况和扳机指严重程度,在两组之间具有可比性。术前QuickDASH评分也相似。ⅰ组患者掌指关节和近端指间关节的平均术前手指活动度较低,但差异无统计学意义。在整个随访期间,I组患者的术后手指活动范围和QuickDASH评分均优于II组。在2周的随访中,差异具有统计学意义。虽然第一组在2个月和4个月时继续表现出更好的结果,但差异在统计学上并不重要。手术时间I组(16.4±5.7分钟)明显长于II组(11.43±3.8分钟)。第一组有两名患者出现了伤口感染,经过一周的抗生素治疗,伤口感染得到了缓解。结论开放式A1滑轮松解配合屈肌腱牵引松解术术后早期(2周)手指屈曲活动范围和QuickDASH评分较好,但手术时间较长。研究类型/证据水平:治疗Ib。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信