Evaluation of artificial intelligence for airway analysis on cone beam computed tomography

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Dr. Rohan Jagtap , Dr. Aniket Jadhav , Dr. Avula Samatha , Dr. Sana Noor Siddiqui , Dr. Prashant Jaju
{"title":"Evaluation of artificial intelligence for airway analysis on cone beam computed tomography","authors":"Dr. Rohan Jagtap ,&nbsp;Dr. Aniket Jadhav ,&nbsp;Dr. Avula Samatha ,&nbsp;Dr. Sana Noor Siddiqui ,&nbsp;Dr. Prashant Jaju","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The aim of the study is to verify the success of an artificial intelligence model for the automatic airway segmentation on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Three hundred CBCT images of adults were used in this study for airway assessment. The algorithm development was carried out using the Mask R-CNN ResNet 101 model. Both manual segmentation and an artificial intelligence (AI) system from Velmeni, Inc., were used for airway analysis. The airway analysis was determined by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists using Anatomage InVivo 3D software. Additionally, the convolutional neural network−based architecture was employed for airway volume detection. A comparison was made between the results obtained from the human observers and the artificial intelligence model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In evaluating the performance of the AI model for the segmentation of airway analysis, true positive, false positive, and false negative values were found to be 485, 18, and 23, respectively. Sensitivity, precision, and F1 score values were calculated as 0.9332, 0.9615, and 0.9766, respectively. The area under curve value was calculated as 0.8467.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The integration of the AI Mask R-CNN ResNet 101 model for airway analysis holds great promise in the decision support system for diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and overall treatment outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49010,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","volume":"139 3","pages":"Page e93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324008605","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

The aim of the study is to verify the success of an artificial intelligence model for the automatic airway segmentation on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.

Materials and Methods

Three hundred CBCT images of adults were used in this study for airway assessment. The algorithm development was carried out using the Mask R-CNN ResNet 101 model. Both manual segmentation and an artificial intelligence (AI) system from Velmeni, Inc., were used for airway analysis. The airway analysis was determined by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists using Anatomage InVivo 3D software. Additionally, the convolutional neural network−based architecture was employed for airway volume detection. A comparison was made between the results obtained from the human observers and the artificial intelligence model.

Results

In evaluating the performance of the AI model for the segmentation of airway analysis, true positive, false positive, and false negative values were found to be 485, 18, and 23, respectively. Sensitivity, precision, and F1 score values were calculated as 0.9332, 0.9615, and 0.9766, respectively. The area under curve value was calculated as 0.8467.

Conclusion

The integration of the AI Mask R-CNN ResNet 101 model for airway analysis holds great promise in the decision support system for diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and overall treatment outcomes.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
1217
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology is required reading for anyone in the fields of oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology or advanced general practice dentistry. It is the only major dental journal that provides a practical and complete overview of the medical and surgical techniques of dental practice in four areas. Topics covered include such current issues as dental implants, treatment of HIV-infected patients, and evaluation and treatment of TMJ disorders. The official publication for nine societies, the Journal is recommended for initial purchase in the Brandon Hill study, Selected List of Books and Journals for the Small Medical Library.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信