{"title":"Divergent responses of optimal land and water allocation to different hydrological regimes in the agricultural water-food-carbon nexus system","authors":"Haomiao Cheng , Anan Wang , Jian Zhang , Xizhi Nong , Xuecheng Jiang , Hainan Wu , Zhaoxia Chen , Menglei Wang , Jilin Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Frequent changes in the hydrological regimes lead to divergent responses of water, food, and carbon (C) emissions in agricultural production, which challenge sustainable agricultural development. Therefore, this study proposed a systematic multi-objective non-linear programming model for investigating divergent responses of optimal land and water allocation to different hydrological regimes from the perspective of the agricultural water-food-carbon (AWFC) nexus framework. The model was capable of simultaneously tackling the trade-offs among water consumption, economic benefit, and C emissions by integrating with spatial–temporal water footprint (WF) and carbon footprint (CF) theories. The universal cropping patterns in each spatial water function zone that adapted to the spatiotemporal variations of hydrological regimes could also be obtained. The applicability and effectiveness of the proposed methodology were verified by a real-world, provincial-scale case, <em>i.e.</em>, Jiangsu Province, southeast China. As for the actual scenario, the optimal scheme under normal, wet, and dry years highlighted the significance of improvement in water-saving (10.31%–12.26%), while showing a slight increase in net economic benefit (2.68%–2.85%) and low-carbon agricultural competitiveness (1.21%–3.58%). It was found that the wet year performed the greatest water-saving potential, and the dry year showed the strongest low-carbon agricultural competitiveness. The optimal cropping patterns suggested that it was a promising management strategy to enhance the comprehensive benefits related to the economy, water, and carbon by increasing the planting proportion of high-value crops with low WF and CF. This study provided scientific methodology and instructions for balancing the trade-off among economy, water, and environment components in sustainable agricultural development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"653 ","pages":"Article 132730"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002216942500068X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Frequent changes in the hydrological regimes lead to divergent responses of water, food, and carbon (C) emissions in agricultural production, which challenge sustainable agricultural development. Therefore, this study proposed a systematic multi-objective non-linear programming model for investigating divergent responses of optimal land and water allocation to different hydrological regimes from the perspective of the agricultural water-food-carbon (AWFC) nexus framework. The model was capable of simultaneously tackling the trade-offs among water consumption, economic benefit, and C emissions by integrating with spatial–temporal water footprint (WF) and carbon footprint (CF) theories. The universal cropping patterns in each spatial water function zone that adapted to the spatiotemporal variations of hydrological regimes could also be obtained. The applicability and effectiveness of the proposed methodology were verified by a real-world, provincial-scale case, i.e., Jiangsu Province, southeast China. As for the actual scenario, the optimal scheme under normal, wet, and dry years highlighted the significance of improvement in water-saving (10.31%–12.26%), while showing a slight increase in net economic benefit (2.68%–2.85%) and low-carbon agricultural competitiveness (1.21%–3.58%). It was found that the wet year performed the greatest water-saving potential, and the dry year showed the strongest low-carbon agricultural competitiveness. The optimal cropping patterns suggested that it was a promising management strategy to enhance the comprehensive benefits related to the economy, water, and carbon by increasing the planting proportion of high-value crops with low WF and CF. This study provided scientific methodology and instructions for balancing the trade-off among economy, water, and environment components in sustainable agricultural development.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.