José A. Garrido-Cervera , María I. Ruiz-Granados , Antonio I. Cuesta-Vargas , Antonio J. Sánchez-Guarnido
{"title":"Validation study for the individual recovery outcomes counter (I.ROC) in a Spanish population.","authors":"José A. Garrido-Cervera , María I. Ruiz-Granados , Antonio I. Cuesta-Vargas , Antonio J. Sánchez-Guarnido","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpsy.2024.100287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><div>To improve mental health recovery, it is necessary to have validated instruments. At present, however, there is a lack of valid instruments capable of measuring the recovery process in Spanish-speaking populations. The objective of this study was therefore to translate, culturally adapt and validate the Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC) for use in Spanish populations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The methodology applied was that recommended for cultural adaptations of questionnaires. It included the following phases: translation, back translation, cultural adaptation and understandability analysis. To assess its psychometric properties, the translated version of the I.ROC was administered to 307 people with severe mental disorders (SMDs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The questionnaire's internal consistency was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha = 0.894). Its stability over time was also appropriate, with no significant differences being found in any of the items in the two evaluations. Concurrent validity with the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS-24) was also acceptable (<em>r</em> = 0.663 <em>p</em> < 0.001). The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) results were concordant with a division into the 4 original factors, but also compatible with two or even with one single general factor.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results of the study suggest that the Spanish version of the I.ROC is a valid, reliable instrument for charting recovery in people with mental disorders (MD).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"39 2","pages":"Article 100287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213616324000375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Objective
To improve mental health recovery, it is necessary to have validated instruments. At present, however, there is a lack of valid instruments capable of measuring the recovery process in Spanish-speaking populations. The objective of this study was therefore to translate, culturally adapt and validate the Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC) for use in Spanish populations.
Methods
The methodology applied was that recommended for cultural adaptations of questionnaires. It included the following phases: translation, back translation, cultural adaptation and understandability analysis. To assess its psychometric properties, the translated version of the I.ROC was administered to 307 people with severe mental disorders (SMDs).
Results
The questionnaire's internal consistency was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha = 0.894). Its stability over time was also appropriate, with no significant differences being found in any of the items in the two evaluations. Concurrent validity with the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS-24) was also acceptable (r = 0.663 p < 0.001). The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) results were concordant with a division into the 4 original factors, but also compatible with two or even with one single general factor.
Conclusion
The results of the study suggest that the Spanish version of the I.ROC is a valid, reliable instrument for charting recovery in people with mental disorders (MD).
期刊介绍:
The European journal of psychiatry is a quarterly publication founded in 1986 and directed by Professor Seva until his death in 2004. It was originally intended to report “the scientific activity of European psychiatrists” and “to bring about a greater degree of communication” among them. However, “since scientific knowledge has no geographical or cultural boundaries, is open to contributions from all over the world”. These principles are maintained in the new stage of the journal, now expanded with the help of an American editor.