Validation study for the individual recovery outcomes counter (I.ROC) in a Spanish population.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
José A. Garrido-Cervera , María I. Ruiz-Granados , Antonio I. Cuesta-Vargas , Antonio J. Sánchez-Guarnido
{"title":"Validation study for the individual recovery outcomes counter (I.ROC) in a Spanish population.","authors":"José A. Garrido-Cervera ,&nbsp;María I. Ruiz-Granados ,&nbsp;Antonio I. Cuesta-Vargas ,&nbsp;Antonio J. Sánchez-Guarnido","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpsy.2024.100287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><div>To improve mental health recovery, it is necessary to have validated instruments. At present, however, there is a lack of valid instruments capable of measuring the recovery process in Spanish-speaking populations. The objective of this study was therefore to translate, culturally adapt and validate the Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC) for use in Spanish populations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The methodology applied was that recommended for cultural adaptations of questionnaires. It included the following phases: translation, back translation, cultural adaptation and understandability analysis. To assess its psychometric properties, the translated version of the I.ROC was administered to 307 people with severe mental disorders (SMDs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The questionnaire's internal consistency was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha = 0.894). Its stability over time was also appropriate, with no significant differences being found in any of the items in the two evaluations. Concurrent validity with the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS-24) was also acceptable (<em>r</em> = 0.663 <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) results were concordant with a division into the 4 original factors, but also compatible with two or even with one single general factor.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results of the study suggest that the Spanish version of the I.ROC is a valid, reliable instrument for charting recovery in people with mental disorders (MD).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"39 2","pages":"Article 100287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213616324000375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective

To improve mental health recovery, it is necessary to have validated instruments. At present, however, there is a lack of valid instruments capable of measuring the recovery process in Spanish-speaking populations. The objective of this study was therefore to translate, culturally adapt and validate the Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC) for use in Spanish populations.

Methods

The methodology applied was that recommended for cultural adaptations of questionnaires. It included the following phases: translation, back translation, cultural adaptation and understandability analysis. To assess its psychometric properties, the translated version of the I.ROC was administered to 307 people with severe mental disorders (SMDs).

Results

The questionnaire's internal consistency was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha = 0.894). Its stability over time was also appropriate, with no significant differences being found in any of the items in the two evaluations. Concurrent validity with the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS-24) was also acceptable (r = 0.663 p < 0.001). The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) results were concordant with a division into the 4 original factors, but also compatible with two or even with one single general factor.

Conclusion

The results of the study suggest that the Spanish version of the I.ROC is a valid, reliable instrument for charting recovery in people with mental disorders (MD).
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The European journal of psychiatry is a quarterly publication founded in 1986 and directed by Professor Seva until his death in 2004. It was originally intended to report “the scientific activity of European psychiatrists” and “to bring about a greater degree of communication” among them. However, “since scientific knowledge has no geographical or cultural boundaries, is open to contributions from all over the world”. These principles are maintained in the new stage of the journal, now expanded with the help of an American editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信