An optimal control model with sensitivity analysis for COVID-19 transmission using logistic recruitment rate

Jonner Nainggolan , Moch. Fandi Ansori , Hengki Tasman
{"title":"An optimal control model with sensitivity analysis for COVID-19 transmission using logistic recruitment rate","authors":"Jonner Nainggolan ,&nbsp;Moch. Fandi Ansori ,&nbsp;Hengki Tasman","doi":"10.1016/j.health.2024.100375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study proposes an optimal control model for COVID-19 spread, incorporating a logistic recruitment rate. The observations show the disease-free equilibrium exists when the population-existing threshold exceeds 1. The stability of equilibrium is determined by the basic reproduction number <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>. This implies that equilibrium is stable when <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> is less than or equal to 1, but it is unstable when the value is greater than 1. Furthermore, an endemic equilibrium and stability is recorded when <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> exceeds 1. To identify influential factors in COVID-19 spread, sensitivity index and sensitivity analyses of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> are conducted. The model perfectly integrates both prevention and therapy controls. As a result, numerical simulations show that the prevention control is more effective than the treatment control in reducing COVID-19 spread. Moreover, the simultaneous implementation of prevention and treatment controls outperforms individual control methods in mitigating COVID-19 spread. Finally, sensitivity analysis conducted with constant controls shows the contributions of the controls to disease dynamics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73222,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772442524000777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes an optimal control model for COVID-19 spread, incorporating a logistic recruitment rate. The observations show the disease-free equilibrium exists when the population-existing threshold exceeds 1. The stability of equilibrium is determined by the basic reproduction number R0. This implies that equilibrium is stable when R0 is less than or equal to 1, but it is unstable when the value is greater than 1. Furthermore, an endemic equilibrium and stability is recorded when R0 exceeds 1. To identify influential factors in COVID-19 spread, sensitivity index and sensitivity analyses of R0 are conducted. The model perfectly integrates both prevention and therapy controls. As a result, numerical simulations show that the prevention control is more effective than the treatment control in reducing COVID-19 spread. Moreover, the simultaneous implementation of prevention and treatment controls outperforms individual control methods in mitigating COVID-19 spread. Finally, sensitivity analysis conducted with constant controls shows the contributions of the controls to disease dynamics.
基于logistic招募率的COVID-19传播最优控制模型及敏感性分析
本研究提出了一个包含logistic招募率的COVID-19传播最优控制模型。观察结果表明,当种群存在阈值超过1时,存在无病平衡。平衡的稳定性由基本繁殖数R0决定。这意味着当R0小于等于1时平衡是稳定的,当R0大于1时平衡是不稳定的。此外,当R0超过1时,记录了地方性平衡和稳定性。为了确定COVID-19传播的影响因素,进行了敏感性指数和R0的敏感性分析。该模型完美地结合了预防和治疗控制。因此,数值模拟结果表明,预防控制比治疗控制在减少COVID-19传播方面更有效。此外,预防和治疗控制同时实施,在缓解COVID-19传播方面优于单独控制方法。最后,在恒定控制下进行的敏感性分析显示了控制对疾病动力学的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.)
Healthcare analytics (New York, N.Y.) Applied Mathematics, Modelling and Simulation, Nursing and Health Professions (General)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
79 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信