Behind the screens. Privacy and advertising preferences in VoD —the role of privacy concerns, persuasion knowledge, and experience

IF 11 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Michał Paliński, Bartosz Jusypenko, Wojciech Hardy
{"title":"Behind the screens. Privacy and advertising preferences in VoD —the role of privacy concerns, persuasion knowledge, and experience","authors":"Michał Paliński,&nbsp;Bartosz Jusypenko,&nbsp;Wojciech Hardy","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores stated preferences for privacy and advertising in the Video on Demand (VoD) context, focusing on Netflix subscribers in Poland. We investigate how privacy concerns, persuasion knowledge, and consumer experience affect these preferences. The study design involved a hypothetical regulatory scenario that mandated platforms to either guarantee minimal data usage or offer compensation for data sharing. Within a discrete choice experiment framework, study participants were presented with hypothetical scenarios and asked to choose between three types of subscription plans, varying in the extent of personal data sharing and ad support. Additionally, a treatment was introduced in which respondents interacted with a mock Netflix environment to enhance their recognition of data practices and increase familiarity with hypothetical outcomes through a simulated experience. Responses from 2087 participants were analyzed using hybrid choice modeling. The results reveal that users are sensitive to the disclosure of personal information in the context of VoD, yet they are open to accepting monetary compensation for a certain degree of sharing. Users with greater persuasion knowledge are more willing to exchange data for discounts, provided the plans do not include personalized ads. Conversely, users with higher privacy concerns prefer plans with minimal data sharing, even when discounts are offered. We observe direct effects of the treatment on both privacy valuation and advertising preferences, particularly regarding time, with the treatment group being significantly more sensitive to ad length. In addition, the treatment group exhibits reduced privacy concerns and no significant difference in persuasion knowledge. Our findings suggest that VoD providers could enhance user control over their data and emphasize transparency, aligning with the increasing reliance on data-driven business models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104233"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698925000128","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores stated preferences for privacy and advertising in the Video on Demand (VoD) context, focusing on Netflix subscribers in Poland. We investigate how privacy concerns, persuasion knowledge, and consumer experience affect these preferences. The study design involved a hypothetical regulatory scenario that mandated platforms to either guarantee minimal data usage or offer compensation for data sharing. Within a discrete choice experiment framework, study participants were presented with hypothetical scenarios and asked to choose between three types of subscription plans, varying in the extent of personal data sharing and ad support. Additionally, a treatment was introduced in which respondents interacted with a mock Netflix environment to enhance their recognition of data practices and increase familiarity with hypothetical outcomes through a simulated experience. Responses from 2087 participants were analyzed using hybrid choice modeling. The results reveal that users are sensitive to the disclosure of personal information in the context of VoD, yet they are open to accepting monetary compensation for a certain degree of sharing. Users with greater persuasion knowledge are more willing to exchange data for discounts, provided the plans do not include personalized ads. Conversely, users with higher privacy concerns prefer plans with minimal data sharing, even when discounts are offered. We observe direct effects of the treatment on both privacy valuation and advertising preferences, particularly regarding time, with the treatment group being significantly more sensitive to ad length. In addition, the treatment group exhibits reduced privacy concerns and no significant difference in persuasion knowledge. Our findings suggest that VoD providers could enhance user control over their data and emphasize transparency, aligning with the increasing reliance on data-driven business models.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信