Exploring vision tests as a surrogate for depression screening in patients with a visual impairment: A cross-sectional study

Karen Eden , Andrew G. Day , Aidan Pucchio , Rohit Shukla , Mark Bona
{"title":"Exploring vision tests as a surrogate for depression screening in patients with a visual impairment: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Karen Eden ,&nbsp;Andrew G. Day ,&nbsp;Aidan Pucchio ,&nbsp;Rohit Shukla ,&nbsp;Mark Bona","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate if vision tests can act as a surrogate for depression screening in visually impaired adult patients, and explore the association between self-reported visual function and depression.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consecutive adult patients (≥18 years) (<em>n</em> = 237) who received a low vision assessment at a hospital-based vision rehabilitation clinic between July 2018 to March 2020, were recruited into the study. The clinic serves patients that have a visual acuity ≤6/15 in the better seeing eye, constricted visual fields &lt;20°, or functional deficits relating to vision loss. Patients were screened for depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The association between risk of depression and vision tests (distance visual acuity, reading acuity, critical print size, contrast sensitivity, and fixation stability) and patient reported visual function (The National Eye Institute, Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25)), was measured using multivariable linear regression modelling.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighteen percent of patients scored ≥10 on the PHQ-9, indicating risk of major depression. There was no significant association between the vision test scores and the PHQ-9. However, there was a significant association between distance visual acuity (<em>p</em> = 0.010), reading acuity (<em>p</em> = 0.008), contrast sensitivity (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001) and the VFQ-25 mental health domain. Further, all VFQ-25 domains were significantly associated with the PHQ-9.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While the vision test scores were not significantly associated with risk of depression, self-reported visual functioning was. We were unable to demonstrate vision tests acting as a surrogate for the PHQ9 when identifying patients at risk of generalized depression. Further investigation is warranted to determine if a correlation can be found with a different mental health-screening tool.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate if vision tests can act as a surrogate for depression screening in visually impaired adult patients, and explore the association between self-reported visual function and depression.

Design

Cross-sectional.

Methods

Consecutive adult patients (≥18 years) (n = 237) who received a low vision assessment at a hospital-based vision rehabilitation clinic between July 2018 to March 2020, were recruited into the study. The clinic serves patients that have a visual acuity ≤6/15 in the better seeing eye, constricted visual fields <20°, or functional deficits relating to vision loss. Patients were screened for depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The association between risk of depression and vision tests (distance visual acuity, reading acuity, critical print size, contrast sensitivity, and fixation stability) and patient reported visual function (The National Eye Institute, Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25)), was measured using multivariable linear regression modelling.

Results

Eighteen percent of patients scored ≥10 on the PHQ-9, indicating risk of major depression. There was no significant association between the vision test scores and the PHQ-9. However, there was a significant association between distance visual acuity (p = 0.010), reading acuity (p = 0.008), contrast sensitivity (p < 0.0001) and the VFQ-25 mental health domain. Further, all VFQ-25 domains were significantly associated with the PHQ-9.

Conclusion

While the vision test scores were not significantly associated with risk of depression, self-reported visual functioning was. We were unable to demonstrate vision tests acting as a surrogate for the PHQ9 when identifying patients at risk of generalized depression. Further investigation is warranted to determine if a correlation can be found with a different mental health-screening tool.
探索视力测试作为视觉障碍患者抑郁症筛查的替代:一项横断面研究
目的探讨视力测试是否可以作为视力障碍成人患者抑郁筛查的替代指标,并探讨自述视觉功能与抑郁之间的关系。方法招募2018年7月至2020年3月在医院视力康复诊所接受低视力评估的连续成人患者(n = 237)(≥18岁)。本诊所服务于视力较好的视力≤6/15,视野狭窄≤20°,或与视力丧失有关的功能缺陷的患者。使用患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)对患者进行抑郁筛查。抑郁症风险与视力测试(距离视力、阅读视力、临界字体大小、对比敏感度和注视稳定性)和患者报告的视觉功能(美国国家眼科研究所视觉功能问卷-25 (VFQ-25))之间的关系采用多变量线性回归模型进行测量。结果18%的患者PHQ-9得分≥10分,提示有重度抑郁风险。视力测试成绩和PHQ-9之间没有明显的联系。然而,远视敏度(p = 0.010)、阅读敏度(p = 0.008)、对比敏度(p <;0.0001)和VFQ-25心理健康领域。此外,所有VFQ-25结构域都与PHQ-9显著相关。结论视力测试分数与抑郁风险无显著相关性,但自报视力功能与抑郁风险有显著相关性。我们无法证明视力测试在识别有广泛性抑郁症风险的患者时可以替代PHQ9。有必要进一步调查,以确定是否可以发现不同的心理健康筛查工具之间的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信