Exploring moral hazard and adverse selection in the context of greenwashing and organic product consumption

IF 11 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Wutthiya Aekthanate Srisathan , Phaninee Naruetharadhol
{"title":"Exploring moral hazard and adverse selection in the context of greenwashing and organic product consumption","authors":"Wutthiya Aekthanate Srisathan ,&nbsp;Phaninee Naruetharadhol","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Behavior within the thematic of decoupling and environmental sustainability is critical in understanding the dynamics of greenwashing in retail environments. Decoupling, which aims to separate economic growth from environmental degradation, is particularly relevant in the organic product market, where consumer trust and sustainable purchasing behaviors are essential. This study investigates the impact of greenwashing on moral hazard and adverse selection in the context of organic products in Thailand. Greenwashing, the practice of making misleading claims about the environmental benefits of products, creates significant information asymmetry, complicating consumer decision-making and undermining trust in genuinely sustainable products. Utilizing a theoretical framework based on asymmetric information theory, this research examines how greenwashing influences green skepticism, information asymmetry, and subsequent market behaviors. An empirical analysis was conducted using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to test the hypotheses with a quota sampling survey of 402 consumers in Thailand who engage in varying levels of organic consumption. The findings reveal that perceived greenwashing for organic products significantly increases green skepticism among consumers. This increased skepticism exacerbates information asymmetry, which in turn, leads to both moral hazard and adverse selection in the market for organic products. Specifically, companies may exploit this information gap by exaggerating their products' sustainability credentials, resulting in consumers making suboptimal purchasing decisions. The study provides robust empirical evidence supporting the hypothesized relationships and highlights the need for stricter regulatory frameworks to combat greenwashing. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed, offering valuable insights for policymakers, businesses, and researchers aiming to promote transparency and sustainability in the consumer market.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104203"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924004995","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behavior within the thematic of decoupling and environmental sustainability is critical in understanding the dynamics of greenwashing in retail environments. Decoupling, which aims to separate economic growth from environmental degradation, is particularly relevant in the organic product market, where consumer trust and sustainable purchasing behaviors are essential. This study investigates the impact of greenwashing on moral hazard and adverse selection in the context of organic products in Thailand. Greenwashing, the practice of making misleading claims about the environmental benefits of products, creates significant information asymmetry, complicating consumer decision-making and undermining trust in genuinely sustainable products. Utilizing a theoretical framework based on asymmetric information theory, this research examines how greenwashing influences green skepticism, information asymmetry, and subsequent market behaviors. An empirical analysis was conducted using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to test the hypotheses with a quota sampling survey of 402 consumers in Thailand who engage in varying levels of organic consumption. The findings reveal that perceived greenwashing for organic products significantly increases green skepticism among consumers. This increased skepticism exacerbates information asymmetry, which in turn, leads to both moral hazard and adverse selection in the market for organic products. Specifically, companies may exploit this information gap by exaggerating their products' sustainability credentials, resulting in consumers making suboptimal purchasing decisions. The study provides robust empirical evidence supporting the hypothesized relationships and highlights the need for stricter regulatory frameworks to combat greenwashing. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed, offering valuable insights for policymakers, businesses, and researchers aiming to promote transparency and sustainability in the consumer market.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信