Ecological restoration of field margins enhances biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in rice agroecosystems

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
N. Pérez-Méndez , C. Alcaraz , M. Catala-Forner
{"title":"Ecological restoration of field margins enhances biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in rice agroecosystems","authors":"N. Pérez-Méndez ,&nbsp;C. Alcaraz ,&nbsp;M. Catala-Forner","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecological restoration of non-productive agricultural areas such as field margins has been identified as a key priority to enhance biodiversity and promote multiple ecosystem services within agroecosystems. Field margin restoration is especially important in rice (<em>Oryza sativa</em>, L), a globally important crop which occupies around 15 % of world cropland surface. Even though assessment of how ecosystem service multifunctionality varies across different restoration strategies is scarce. Here, by using a 3-year field scale experiment, we evaluated how different restoration strategies (i.e., hedgerows, flower strips and passive restoration) contribute to ecosystem service multifunctionality in rice farming. We focused on the simultaneous provision of biodiversity enhancement, pest and weed control, mitigation of invasive species impact, and soil protection. We found that all restoration strategies substantially increased multifunctionality when compared to non-restored margins, with improved plant and natural enemy diversity, reduced weed abundance, enhanced protection against the invasive red swamp crawfish, and decreased soil erosion. Multifunctionality was similar across restoration strategies, yet the passive spontaneous restoration emerged as the most economically feasible. Overall, our results underscore the value of restoring non-productive areas such as field margins to promote rice multifunctional landscapes. Specifically, passive restoration strategies offer a promising approach to enhance multiple ecosystem services while remaining cost-effective, supporting both biodiversity conservation and sustainable agricultural production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"382 ","pages":"Article 109484"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925000167","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecological restoration of non-productive agricultural areas such as field margins has been identified as a key priority to enhance biodiversity and promote multiple ecosystem services within agroecosystems. Field margin restoration is especially important in rice (Oryza sativa, L), a globally important crop which occupies around 15 % of world cropland surface. Even though assessment of how ecosystem service multifunctionality varies across different restoration strategies is scarce. Here, by using a 3-year field scale experiment, we evaluated how different restoration strategies (i.e., hedgerows, flower strips and passive restoration) contribute to ecosystem service multifunctionality in rice farming. We focused on the simultaneous provision of biodiversity enhancement, pest and weed control, mitigation of invasive species impact, and soil protection. We found that all restoration strategies substantially increased multifunctionality when compared to non-restored margins, with improved plant and natural enemy diversity, reduced weed abundance, enhanced protection against the invasive red swamp crawfish, and decreased soil erosion. Multifunctionality was similar across restoration strategies, yet the passive spontaneous restoration emerged as the most economically feasible. Overall, our results underscore the value of restoring non-productive areas such as field margins to promote rice multifunctional landscapes. Specifically, passive restoration strategies offer a promising approach to enhance multiple ecosystem services while remaining cost-effective, supporting both biodiversity conservation and sustainable agricultural production.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信