Environmental assessment and mitigation strategies for dairy cattle farms in Colombia: Greenhouse gas emissions, non-renewable energy use, and land use

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Ricardo González-Quintero , Rolando Barahona-Rosales , Jacobo Arango , Diana María Bolívar-Vergara , Manuel Gómez , Ngonidzashe Chirinda , María Solange Sánchez-Pinzón
{"title":"Environmental assessment and mitigation strategies for dairy cattle farms in Colombia: Greenhouse gas emissions, non-renewable energy use, and land use","authors":"Ricardo González-Quintero ,&nbsp;Rolando Barahona-Rosales ,&nbsp;Jacobo Arango ,&nbsp;Diana María Bolívar-Vergara ,&nbsp;Manuel Gómez ,&nbsp;Ngonidzashe Chirinda ,&nbsp;María Solange Sánchez-Pinzón","doi":"10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In Colombia, cattle farming is responsible for 15 % of national greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), consequently, it is crucial to develop mitigation strategies that can reduce their climate impact. Using a Life Cycle Assessment approach, this study quantified the environmental burdens of 192 specialized dairy systems and determined mitigation strategies. Carbon footprint (CF), land use, and non-renewable energy use were calculated by applying the 2019 Refinement to 2006 IPCC guidelines and impact factors. The functional units considered were one kilogram of fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) and one kilogram of live weight gain (LWG) from a cradle-to-farm-gate perspective. The findings revealed that enteric fermentation and manure left in pastures were the primary sources of on-farm GHGE, while feed manufacturing contributed significantly to off-farm emissions. Milk CF values ranged between 0.6 to 3.9 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq kg FPCM<sup>−1</sup> when the biological allocation method was applied. Through clustering analysis, three farm clusters were identified, with Cluster 1 demonstrating higher milk productivity, better paddock and cattle manageability, and improved environmental behavior compared to the other clusters. The adoption of improved pastures as a mitigation strategy resulted in a significant reduction of milk CF by 20 % to 39 %. This study provides evidence supporting the effectiveness of mitigation strategies such as the inclusion of improved pastures, adoption of good cattle management practices, improvements in fertilizer usage, identification of an adequate stocking rate, and enhancement of milk yields in dairy production systems. These reductions in GHGE intensities can be achieved with a negative economic cost, highlighting the potential for sustainable and economically viable cattle farming practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18152,"journal":{"name":"Livestock Science","volume":"291 ","pages":"Article 105625"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Livestock Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324002312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Colombia, cattle farming is responsible for 15 % of national greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), consequently, it is crucial to develop mitigation strategies that can reduce their climate impact. Using a Life Cycle Assessment approach, this study quantified the environmental burdens of 192 specialized dairy systems and determined mitigation strategies. Carbon footprint (CF), land use, and non-renewable energy use were calculated by applying the 2019 Refinement to 2006 IPCC guidelines and impact factors. The functional units considered were one kilogram of fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM) and one kilogram of live weight gain (LWG) from a cradle-to-farm-gate perspective. The findings revealed that enteric fermentation and manure left in pastures were the primary sources of on-farm GHGE, while feed manufacturing contributed significantly to off-farm emissions. Milk CF values ranged between 0.6 to 3.9 kg CO2-eq kg FPCM−1 when the biological allocation method was applied. Through clustering analysis, three farm clusters were identified, with Cluster 1 demonstrating higher milk productivity, better paddock and cattle manageability, and improved environmental behavior compared to the other clusters. The adoption of improved pastures as a mitigation strategy resulted in a significant reduction of milk CF by 20 % to 39 %. This study provides evidence supporting the effectiveness of mitigation strategies such as the inclusion of improved pastures, adoption of good cattle management practices, improvements in fertilizer usage, identification of an adequate stocking rate, and enhancement of milk yields in dairy production systems. These reductions in GHGE intensities can be achieved with a negative economic cost, highlighting the potential for sustainable and economically viable cattle farming practices.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Livestock Science
Livestock Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
237
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Livestock Science promotes the sound development of the livestock sector by publishing original, peer-reviewed research and review articles covering all aspects of this broad field. The journal welcomes submissions on the avant-garde areas of animal genetics, breeding, growth, reproduction, nutrition, physiology, and behaviour in addition to genetic resources, welfare, ethics, health, management and production systems. The high-quality content of this journal reflects the truly international nature of this broad area of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信