{"title":"Efficient Inefficiency: Organisational challenges of realising economic gains from AI","authors":"Stuart Mills , David A. Spencer","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Organisations are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI). Where AI performs productive tasks more efficiently than humans, organisations will benefit economically through increases in productivity. However, if AI is deployed to undertake unproductive, superfluous tasks, the efficiency benefits will be reduced, even if these tasks are performed more efficiently than a human could, because the said tasks are inefficient to begin with. We call this eventuality ‘efficient inefficiency.’</div><div>We outline several reasons why superfluous tasks are created by managers and why they persist in organisations, drawing on an array of behavioural, managerial, and sociological literature. We argue bounded rationality accounts for why managers often fail to identify superfluous tasks, coupled with organisational conflicts which often incentivise their creation. These factors impede the ability of organisations to avoid efficient inefficiency. Restructuring organisations to promote knowledge sharing and align stakeholder incentives may reduce, though not eliminate, the risk of efficient inefficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 115128"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324006325","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Organisations are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI). Where AI performs productive tasks more efficiently than humans, organisations will benefit economically through increases in productivity. However, if AI is deployed to undertake unproductive, superfluous tasks, the efficiency benefits will be reduced, even if these tasks are performed more efficiently than a human could, because the said tasks are inefficient to begin with. We call this eventuality ‘efficient inefficiency.’
We outline several reasons why superfluous tasks are created by managers and why they persist in organisations, drawing on an array of behavioural, managerial, and sociological literature. We argue bounded rationality accounts for why managers often fail to identify superfluous tasks, coupled with organisational conflicts which often incentivise their creation. These factors impede the ability of organisations to avoid efficient inefficiency. Restructuring organisations to promote knowledge sharing and align stakeholder incentives may reduce, though not eliminate, the risk of efficient inefficiency.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.