EV charging for multifamily housing: Review of evidence, methods, barriers, and opportunities

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
M. Kuby , A. Cordova-Cruzatty , N.C. Parker , D.A. King
{"title":"EV charging for multifamily housing: Review of evidence, methods, barriers, and opportunities","authors":"M. Kuby ,&nbsp;A. Cordova-Cruzatty ,&nbsp;N.C. Parker ,&nbsp;D.A. King","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For equitable electric vehicle adoption, the challenge posed by the dearth of home-charging infrastructure for multifamily housing residents has been widely acknowledged but infrequently studied. As research and practitioners began to focus on equity concerns in the 2010s, the non-peer-reviewed “grey” literature (consisting of reports from university centers, national labs, nongovernmental organizations, consultants, and government agencies) advanced faster and further than peer-reviewed articles. The major research gap in this field is the extremely small number of peer-reviewed papers focused entirely on electric vehicle charging for multifamily housing. As a result, this review also includes (a) studies of charging infrastructure that separately examine multifamily charging, and (b) studies of electric vehicle adoption that address how the lack of home charging hampers equitable adoption. This study reviews 103 documents in this emerging research area. Research often combine<strong>s</strong> a variety of methods to study this problem, which this paper groups into spatial or geographic analysis; survey research; statistical modeling; qualitative research; policy, law, economic, engineering, and business research; and case studies, site visits, and pilot projects. Every study viewed multifamily housing and renting as posing substantial barriers including physical/technological (especially parking and electrical capacity); financial (especially the high cost); management; public acceptance/demand; and regulatory/legal issues. This research proposed the first classification system for the varied solutions proposed, including incentives and subsidies; technological; new business models; regulatory and legal; geographical (including curbside or streetlights); education and outreach; and substitution. With so few studies focused on this problem, many promising directions beckon to future researchers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 115253"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124009791","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For equitable electric vehicle adoption, the challenge posed by the dearth of home-charging infrastructure for multifamily housing residents has been widely acknowledged but infrequently studied. As research and practitioners began to focus on equity concerns in the 2010s, the non-peer-reviewed “grey” literature (consisting of reports from university centers, national labs, nongovernmental organizations, consultants, and government agencies) advanced faster and further than peer-reviewed articles. The major research gap in this field is the extremely small number of peer-reviewed papers focused entirely on electric vehicle charging for multifamily housing. As a result, this review also includes (a) studies of charging infrastructure that separately examine multifamily charging, and (b) studies of electric vehicle adoption that address how the lack of home charging hampers equitable adoption. This study reviews 103 documents in this emerging research area. Research often combines a variety of methods to study this problem, which this paper groups into spatial or geographic analysis; survey research; statistical modeling; qualitative research; policy, law, economic, engineering, and business research; and case studies, site visits, and pilot projects. Every study viewed multifamily housing and renting as posing substantial barriers including physical/technological (especially parking and electrical capacity); financial (especially the high cost); management; public acceptance/demand; and regulatory/legal issues. This research proposed the first classification system for the varied solutions proposed, including incentives and subsidies; technological; new business models; regulatory and legal; geographical (including curbside or streetlights); education and outreach; and substitution. With so few studies focused on this problem, many promising directions beckon to future researchers.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信