Do cognitive bias and heuristics influence improvement in knee pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis treated with open label placebo? The CHIPS study - An exploratory study using questionnaire and group concept mapping

IF 2.8
Tommy Kok Annfeldt , Elisabeth Ginnerup-Nielsen , Eva Elisabeth Wæhrens , Lene Vase , Lars Erik Kristensen , Tanja Schjødt Jørgensen
{"title":"Do cognitive bias and heuristics influence improvement in knee pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis treated with open label placebo? The CHIPS study - An exploratory study using questionnaire and group concept mapping","authors":"Tommy Kok Annfeldt ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Ginnerup-Nielsen ,&nbsp;Eva Elisabeth Wæhrens ,&nbsp;Lene Vase ,&nbsp;Lars Erik Kristensen ,&nbsp;Tanja Schjødt Jørgensen","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study explored if the patient-experience and the affect heuristic influenced improvements in painful symptoms, in response to open label placebo injections in patients with knee OA. It furthermore explored if other cognitive biases or heuristics were involved in the response to open-label placebo.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A mixed method study in a pre-specified knee OA cohort. The influence of patient-experience, and the affect heuristic, on change in painful symptoms in response to an open-label placebo injection, were assessed using a questionnaire and multivariate linear regression. The group concept mapping method was used to characterise the expectations and hopes regarding the effect of an open-label placebo injection in non-responders and responders, defined as the lower- and upper quartile of the ΔVAS pain scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>103 participants received the questionnaire, and 60 finalised questionnaires were included in the analysis showing that the reduction in pain was associated with the patient-experience and that the affect heuristic acted as an effect modifier. Three workshops were held for non-responders (<em>n</em> ​= ​13) and responders (<em>n</em> ​= ​15) each generating respectively 113 and 119 statements. It was found that the two groups reported different expectations and hopes for the open label placebo injections.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The patient-experience influenced the response to an open label placebo injection in patients with knee OA, and this influence was moderated by the strength of the affect heuristic. Furthermore, non-responders and responders reported different hopes and expectation towards the open label placebo injection indicating the presence of the optimism bias in the responder group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266591312500010X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study explored if the patient-experience and the affect heuristic influenced improvements in painful symptoms, in response to open label placebo injections in patients with knee OA. It furthermore explored if other cognitive biases or heuristics were involved in the response to open-label placebo.

Method

A mixed method study in a pre-specified knee OA cohort. The influence of patient-experience, and the affect heuristic, on change in painful symptoms in response to an open-label placebo injection, were assessed using a questionnaire and multivariate linear regression. The group concept mapping method was used to characterise the expectations and hopes regarding the effect of an open-label placebo injection in non-responders and responders, defined as the lower- and upper quartile of the ΔVAS pain scores.

Results

103 participants received the questionnaire, and 60 finalised questionnaires were included in the analysis showing that the reduction in pain was associated with the patient-experience and that the affect heuristic acted as an effect modifier. Three workshops were held for non-responders (n ​= ​13) and responders (n ​= ​15) each generating respectively 113 and 119 statements. It was found that the two groups reported different expectations and hopes for the open label placebo injections.

Conclusions

The patient-experience influenced the response to an open label placebo injection in patients with knee OA, and this influence was moderated by the strength of the affect heuristic. Furthermore, non-responders and responders reported different hopes and expectation towards the open label placebo injection indicating the presence of the optimism bias in the responder group.
认知偏差和启发式是否影响接受开放标签安慰剂治疗的膝关节骨关节炎患者膝关节疼痛的改善?CHIPS研究-一项使用问卷调查和群体概念图的探索性研究
目的探讨开放标签安慰剂注射对膝关节OA患者疼痛症状的改善是否有患者体验和情感启发式影响。它进一步探讨了其他认知偏见或启发式是否涉及对开放标签安慰剂的反应。方法在预先指定的膝关节OA队列中采用混合方法进行研究。使用问卷调查和多元线性回归评估患者经验和启发式影响对开放标签安慰剂注射后疼痛症状变化的影响。使用组概念映射方法来描述对开放标签安慰剂注射在无反应者和反应者中的效果的期望和希望,定义为ΔVAS疼痛评分的上下四分位数。结果103名参与者收到了问卷,60份最终问卷被纳入分析,结果表明疼痛的减轻与患者的体验有关,并且影响启发式作为效果修饰符。为无反应者(n = 13)和反应者(n = 15)举办了三个讲习班,每个讲习班分别产生113和119个陈述。研究发现,两组报告了对开放标签安慰剂注射的不同期望和希望。结论患者体验影响了膝关节OA患者对开放标签安慰剂注射的反应,这种影响被情感启发式的强度所调节。此外,无反应者和反应者报告了对开放标签安慰剂注射的不同希望和期望,这表明反应者组存在乐观偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信