Impacto del uso de redes sociales en las gestantes del área norte de Madrid

IF 0.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
N. Mateos-Canals, S. Ruiz-Martínez, N. Martínez Sánchez, J.L. Bartha Rasero, M.C. Fernández-Miranda
{"title":"Impacto del uso de redes sociales en las gestantes del área norte de Madrid","authors":"N. Mateos-Canals,&nbsp;S. Ruiz-Martínez,&nbsp;N. Martínez Sánchez,&nbsp;J.L. Bartha Rasero,&nbsp;M.C. Fernández-Miranda","doi":"10.1016/j.gine.2024.101030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the use of social media (SM) and its impact on pregnant women in the northern area of Madrid, Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>An anonymous survey was conducted with 231 pregnant women who were monitored in the Obstetrics Service of La Paz University Hospital (Madrid). The use of various SM platforms and the information sought were evaluated, as well as the perceived credibility, influence on attitudes, and effects on perceived anxiety following their use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>97% of pregnant women used SM, with 83.5% using it daily. Usage was higher among younger age groups, with Instagram being the most used SM platform. 81.7% of them followed profiles related to obstetrics/perinatal care, but one in five was unaware of the professionalism of the person behind the profile. Information about pregnancy, childbirth, neonatal care, and breastfeeding were the most sought-after topics, with an increase in the search for breastfeeding information among younger women. 45.4% considered the information to be highly credible, and 49.3% believed it could moderately influence their attitudes. Finally, 47.4% reported feeling moderately calm with the information, and 51.2% experienced low levels of anxiety.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The use of SM among pregnant women reflects that of the general population, with Instagram being the most popular platform. Many patients seek medical information on SM but often verify it with healthcare professionals. The credibility of information on SM varies, having a moderate influence on attitudes and perceived anxiety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":41294,"journal":{"name":"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia","volume":"52 2","pages":"Article 101030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica e Investigacion en Ginecologia y Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210573X24000935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the use of social media (SM) and its impact on pregnant women in the northern area of Madrid, Spain.

Method

An anonymous survey was conducted with 231 pregnant women who were monitored in the Obstetrics Service of La Paz University Hospital (Madrid). The use of various SM platforms and the information sought were evaluated, as well as the perceived credibility, influence on attitudes, and effects on perceived anxiety following their use.

Results

97% of pregnant women used SM, with 83.5% using it daily. Usage was higher among younger age groups, with Instagram being the most used SM platform. 81.7% of them followed profiles related to obstetrics/perinatal care, but one in five was unaware of the professionalism of the person behind the profile. Information about pregnancy, childbirth, neonatal care, and breastfeeding were the most sought-after topics, with an increase in the search for breastfeeding information among younger women. 45.4% considered the information to be highly credible, and 49.3% believed it could moderately influence their attitudes. Finally, 47.4% reported feeling moderately calm with the information, and 51.2% experienced low levels of anxiety.

Conclusions

The use of SM among pregnant women reflects that of the general population, with Instagram being the most popular platform. Many patients seek medical information on SM but often verify it with healthcare professionals. The credibility of information on SM varies, having a moderate influence on attitudes and perceived anxiety.
使用社交网络对马德里北部地区孕妇的影响
目的了解西班牙马德里北部地区孕妇使用社交媒体的情况及其影响。方法对马德里拉巴斯大学医院产科监测的231例孕妇进行匿名调查。评估了各种SM平台的使用情况和所寻求的信息,以及使用这些平台后感知到的可信度、对态度的影响以及对感知到的焦虑的影响。结果97%的孕妇使用过SM, 83.5%的孕妇每日使用。年轻群体的使用率更高,Instagram是最常用的SM平台。其中81.7%的人关注与产科/围产期护理相关的资料,但五分之一的人不知道资料背后的人的专业性。有关怀孕、分娩、新生儿护理和母乳喂养的信息是最受欢迎的话题,年轻女性对母乳喂养信息的搜索有所增加。45.4%的人认为信息高度可信,49.3%的人认为信息会适度影响他们的态度。最后,47.4%的人表示对这些信息感到适度平静,51.2%的人感到低水平的焦虑。结论孕妇使用SM反映了一般人群的使用情况,Instagram是最受欢迎的平台。许多患者寻求关于性行为的医疗信息,但往往向医疗保健专业人员求证。SM信息的可信度存在差异,对态度和感知焦虑有中等程度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Una excelente publicación para mantenerse al día en los temas de máximo interés de la ginecología de vanguardia. Resulta idónea tanto para el especialista en ginecología, como en obstetricia o en pediatría, y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信