“It's hard to talk to a computer, I get it”: An exploratory analysis of clinician connection-building communication practices in rural telepalliative care encounters

Elise C. Tarbi , Natalie Ambrose , Eric C. Anderson , Rebecca N. Hutchinson , Paul K.J. Han , Maija Reblin , Robert Gramling
{"title":"“It's hard to talk to a computer, I get it”: An exploratory analysis of clinician connection-building communication practices in rural telepalliative care encounters","authors":"Elise C. Tarbi ,&nbsp;Natalie Ambrose ,&nbsp;Eric C. Anderson ,&nbsp;Rebecca N. Hutchinson ,&nbsp;Paul K.J. Han ,&nbsp;Maija Reblin ,&nbsp;Robert Gramling","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context/Objectives</h3><div>Establishing human connection is critical during serious illness conversations, however the sensory and relational environment of telehealth may require innovative communication practices for clinicians, patients, and families to do so effectively. We sought to explore if and how recommended in-person best practices for establishing human connection are adapted to the telehealth palliative care (telePC) setting, to enable discovery and description of practice innovations in this new care environment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from the Northern New England Palliative Care TeleConsult Research Study – a formative mixed-methods pilot study at two academic medical centers in rural US states with patients with serious illness (2019–2020). We used a qualitative descriptive approach paired with directed content analysis to analyze video-recorded telePC consultations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nine video-recorded telePC consultations were analyzed including 9 patients and 6 palliative care clinicians. Patient-participants had a mean age of 68 years, 56 % were women, and 38 % did not complete high school. Mean consultation duration was 52 min (standard deviation 10, range 40–70 min). Our qualitative analysis of visits resulted in three key themes describing clinician communication: 1) Practices for fostering human connection; 2) Practices for overcoming technical problems/difficulties; and 3) Practices for engaging in multi-participant tele-conversations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study findings help to provide proof-of-concept evidence that clinicians can use recommended in-person connection-building communication practices in telePC. As palliative care clinicians naturally adapt to telehealth environments, more empirical research is needed to understand which innovative approaches most effectively foster human connection.</div></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><div>TelePC represents an expanding, yet understudied, mode of palliative care delivery. This study is among the first to describe how the telePC context is catalyzing naturally-occurring communication innovations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628225000068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context/Objectives

Establishing human connection is critical during serious illness conversations, however the sensory and relational environment of telehealth may require innovative communication practices for clinicians, patients, and families to do so effectively. We sought to explore if and how recommended in-person best practices for establishing human connection are adapted to the telehealth palliative care (telePC) setting, to enable discovery and description of practice innovations in this new care environment.

Methods

We analyzed data from the Northern New England Palliative Care TeleConsult Research Study – a formative mixed-methods pilot study at two academic medical centers in rural US states with patients with serious illness (2019–2020). We used a qualitative descriptive approach paired with directed content analysis to analyze video-recorded telePC consultations.

Results

Nine video-recorded telePC consultations were analyzed including 9 patients and 6 palliative care clinicians. Patient-participants had a mean age of 68 years, 56 % were women, and 38 % did not complete high school. Mean consultation duration was 52 min (standard deviation 10, range 40–70 min). Our qualitative analysis of visits resulted in three key themes describing clinician communication: 1) Practices for fostering human connection; 2) Practices for overcoming technical problems/difficulties; and 3) Practices for engaging in multi-participant tele-conversations.

Conclusion

Our study findings help to provide proof-of-concept evidence that clinicians can use recommended in-person connection-building communication practices in telePC. As palliative care clinicians naturally adapt to telehealth environments, more empirical research is needed to understand which innovative approaches most effectively foster human connection.

Innovation

TelePC represents an expanding, yet understudied, mode of palliative care delivery. This study is among the first to describe how the telePC context is catalyzing naturally-occurring communication innovations.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信