Crack assessment in spiral-welded pipelines repaired by composite patch: A SMART and failure assessment diagram approach

IF 4.9 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Ardeshir Savari
{"title":"Crack assessment in spiral-welded pipelines repaired by composite patch: A SMART and failure assessment diagram approach","authors":"Ardeshir Savari","doi":"10.1016/j.jpse.2024.100222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a methodology for assessing cracks in spiral-welded pipelines (SWPs) repaired with composite sleeves, utilizing the Separating Morphing and Adaptive Remeshing Technique (SMART) for crack growth modeling and a failure assessment diagram (FAD) approach. Stress analysis identifies critical regions for crack initiation, and Ansys™ Mechanical software is used for automated remeshing to study crack growth. Various scenarios are considered, including stationary cracks and those that grow under static or cyclic loading. A parametric analysis examines the impact of factors such as crack dimensions, internal pressure, sleeve mechanical properties, and repair thickness on both non-repaired and repaired models. Safety factors are derived using the FAD curve, accounting for both conservative and non-conservative fracture criteria. The study finds that composite repairs are more effective for deep, long cracks than for shallow, short ones. Although the evaluation of stress intensity factors (SIFs) and stresses might suggest safety, FAD assessments indicate potential failure risks, necessitating urgent repairs. The extracted safety factors demonstrate the effectiveness of composite patches in enhancing the reliability of SWPs, regardless of employing a conservative or non-conservative approach. This methodology provides valuable insights into the assessment and repair of SWPs with composite sleeves.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100222"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143324000490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a methodology for assessing cracks in spiral-welded pipelines (SWPs) repaired with composite sleeves, utilizing the Separating Morphing and Adaptive Remeshing Technique (SMART) for crack growth modeling and a failure assessment diagram (FAD) approach. Stress analysis identifies critical regions for crack initiation, and Ansys™ Mechanical software is used for automated remeshing to study crack growth. Various scenarios are considered, including stationary cracks and those that grow under static or cyclic loading. A parametric analysis examines the impact of factors such as crack dimensions, internal pressure, sleeve mechanical properties, and repair thickness on both non-repaired and repaired models. Safety factors are derived using the FAD curve, accounting for both conservative and non-conservative fracture criteria. The study finds that composite repairs are more effective for deep, long cracks than for shallow, short ones. Although the evaluation of stress intensity factors (SIFs) and stresses might suggest safety, FAD assessments indicate potential failure risks, necessitating urgent repairs. The extracted safety factors demonstrate the effectiveness of composite patches in enhancing the reliability of SWPs, regardless of employing a conservative or non-conservative approach. This methodology provides valuable insights into the assessment and repair of SWPs with composite sleeves.
复合修补螺旋焊管道的裂纹评估:基于SMART和失效评估图的方法
本研究提出了一种评估复合材料套管修复的螺旋焊接管道(SWPs)裂纹的方法,利用分离变形和自适应重网格技术(SMART)进行裂纹扩展建模和失效评估图(FAD)方法。应力分析确定裂纹萌生的关键区域,并使用Ansys™机械软件进行自动网格划分以研究裂纹扩展。考虑了各种情况,包括静止裂缝和那些在静力或循环荷载下生长的裂缝。参数分析检查了诸如裂纹尺寸、内部压力、套筒机械性能和修复厚度等因素对未修复和修复模型的影响。使用FAD曲线推导安全系数,考虑保守和非保守骨折标准。研究发现,复合材料修复深而长的裂缝比修复浅而短的裂缝更有效。虽然应力强度因子(SIFs)和应力的评估可能表明安全,但FAD评估表明潜在的失效风险,需要紧急维修。提取的安全系数表明,无论采用保守或非保守方法,复合贴片在提高SWPs可靠性方面都是有效的。该方法为使用复合滑套的swp的评估和修复提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信