A decision-making framework for prioritizing reconstruction projects in post-disaster recovery

IF 6 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ahmed Wajeh Mushtaha, Wesam Salah Alaloul, Abdullah O. Baarimah, Muhammad Ali Musarat, Khalid Mhmoud Alzubi, Abdul Mateen Khan
{"title":"A decision-making framework for prioritizing reconstruction projects in post-disaster recovery","authors":"Ahmed Wajeh Mushtaha,&nbsp;Wesam Salah Alaloul,&nbsp;Abdullah O. Baarimah,&nbsp;Muhammad Ali Musarat,&nbsp;Khalid Mhmoud Alzubi,&nbsp;Abdul Mateen Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Disaster recovery requires urgent but thoughtful decision-making in the face of scarce resources, making it essential to prioritize projects that will strengthen community resilience and functionality. Disasters, defined as sudden, catastrophic events that disrupt the functioning of communities and cause significant human, material, economic, or environmental losses, create a pressing need for effective prioritization. Effective prioritization considers structural integrity, safety, economic viability, social impact, and environmental sustainability. However, a systematic framework to guide resource prioritization in post-disaster recovery is lacking. To address the gap in systematic prioritization, this research aims to develop a clear framework that guides post-disaster rebuilders in the efficient allocation of scarce resources based on resilience and equity principles. Results were achieved by investigating a total of 273 experts in post-disaster reconstruction, with 62 % possessing over ten years of experience. Top findings indicate that structural integrity and functionality are the most important. In addition, safety considerations in terms of immediate access for responders (85.0 %) are crucial, along with social requirements, including the impacts on affected populations (85.9 %) and vulnerable groups (77.7 %).Economic considerations prioritize funding availability (76.8 %) and resource access (70.6 %), while environmental concerns highlight public health impacts (82.6 %) and environmental hazards (81.1 %). The findings emphasize the need for the development of a holistic, evidence-based prioritization smart system that will balance immediate recovery needs with long-term resilience objectives. Those actionable insights aim to support policymakers and practitioners to discussions on how strategic resource allocation may help build resilience and ensure adequate, equitable recovery in disaster-stricken areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36919,"journal":{"name":"Results in Engineering","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 103693"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024019364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disaster recovery requires urgent but thoughtful decision-making in the face of scarce resources, making it essential to prioritize projects that will strengthen community resilience and functionality. Disasters, defined as sudden, catastrophic events that disrupt the functioning of communities and cause significant human, material, economic, or environmental losses, create a pressing need for effective prioritization. Effective prioritization considers structural integrity, safety, economic viability, social impact, and environmental sustainability. However, a systematic framework to guide resource prioritization in post-disaster recovery is lacking. To address the gap in systematic prioritization, this research aims to develop a clear framework that guides post-disaster rebuilders in the efficient allocation of scarce resources based on resilience and equity principles. Results were achieved by investigating a total of 273 experts in post-disaster reconstruction, with 62 % possessing over ten years of experience. Top findings indicate that structural integrity and functionality are the most important. In addition, safety considerations in terms of immediate access for responders (85.0 %) are crucial, along with social requirements, including the impacts on affected populations (85.9 %) and vulnerable groups (77.7 %).Economic considerations prioritize funding availability (76.8 %) and resource access (70.6 %), while environmental concerns highlight public health impacts (82.6 %) and environmental hazards (81.1 %). The findings emphasize the need for the development of a holistic, evidence-based prioritization smart system that will balance immediate recovery needs with long-term resilience objectives. Those actionable insights aim to support policymakers and practitioners to discussions on how strategic resource allocation may help build resilience and ensure adequate, equitable recovery in disaster-stricken areas.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Results in Engineering
Results in Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
34.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信