Exploring the research on managers’ safety commitment through the prism of leadership. Part 1: A bibliometric analysis

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
David Levovnik , Darija Aleksić , Marko Gerbec
{"title":"Exploring the research on managers’ safety commitment through the prism of leadership. Part 1: A bibliometric analysis","authors":"David Levovnik ,&nbsp;Darija Aleksić ,&nbsp;Marko Gerbec","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the safety literature, managers' commitment to safety has been recognised as an important concept that can play a central role when organisations strive to improve safety performance in the context of process safety, as well as beyond. The concept of managers' commitment to safety is closely intertwined with the concept of leadership, as leadership style represents an important way managers can express their commitment to safety. However, research on this niche field remains scarce and fragmented. To gain a holistic overview and an objective understanding of how research on mangers’ commitment to safety has evolved over time, we conducted a bibliometric analysis (Part 1). By employing different types of co-citation analyses, we gain insight into the knowledge base and determine the intellectual structure of research. In addition, we used bibliographic coupling and co-word analysis to identify recent publications that constitute the research front and to highlight the most important key terms in recent publications to identify possible future directions in which this research field might evolve. The distribution analysis of the publications reveals that publications gained momentum after 2010. The results show that publications primarily draw knowledge from three major disciplines: safety science, management and organisation, and psychology. This indicates the interdisciplinary nature of this research topic. Further, results suggest that recent publications explored the concept of safety commitment not only in the context of climate and culture, which was common in the past but also directly with managers and their leadership, indicating the trend in future research. The bibliometric analysis outlines the intellectual structure of research on this topic, recaps the evolution of the research topic over time and highlights possible directions in which this research field might develop in the future. To gain a deeper understanding of the research topic, we conducted a systematic literature review, which is presented in the second paper (Part 2).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 105527"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423024002857","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the safety literature, managers' commitment to safety has been recognised as an important concept that can play a central role when organisations strive to improve safety performance in the context of process safety, as well as beyond. The concept of managers' commitment to safety is closely intertwined with the concept of leadership, as leadership style represents an important way managers can express their commitment to safety. However, research on this niche field remains scarce and fragmented. To gain a holistic overview and an objective understanding of how research on mangers’ commitment to safety has evolved over time, we conducted a bibliometric analysis (Part 1). By employing different types of co-citation analyses, we gain insight into the knowledge base and determine the intellectual structure of research. In addition, we used bibliographic coupling and co-word analysis to identify recent publications that constitute the research front and to highlight the most important key terms in recent publications to identify possible future directions in which this research field might evolve. The distribution analysis of the publications reveals that publications gained momentum after 2010. The results show that publications primarily draw knowledge from three major disciplines: safety science, management and organisation, and psychology. This indicates the interdisciplinary nature of this research topic. Further, results suggest that recent publications explored the concept of safety commitment not only in the context of climate and culture, which was common in the past but also directly with managers and their leadership, indicating the trend in future research. The bibliometric analysis outlines the intellectual structure of research on this topic, recaps the evolution of the research topic over time and highlights possible directions in which this research field might develop in the future. To gain a deeper understanding of the research topic, we conducted a systematic literature review, which is presented in the second paper (Part 2).
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信