Œuvres d’art méconnues de la grotte du Mas d’Azil (Ariège). Les aurochs « mal définis » de la collection Marthe et Saint-Just Péquart. Musée d’Archéologie nationale
Audrey Rouquette , Catherine Schwab , Patrick Paillet
{"title":"Œuvres d’art méconnues de la grotte du Mas d’Azil (Ariège). Les aurochs « mal définis » de la collection Marthe et Saint-Just Péquart. Musée d’Archéologie nationale","authors":"Audrey Rouquette , Catherine Schwab , Patrick Paillet","doi":"10.1016/j.anthro.2024.103307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The left bank of the Arize has a particularly important place in the history of the Mas d’Azil cave, as it was on this hundred-meter-long terrace that Édouard Piette (1827–1906) first recognised the Azilian period (between 14,500 and 12,000<!--> <!-->cal BP) in 1889. Beneath this Azilian horizon, a flood silt nearly 6 centimeters thick yielded various lenses of Magdalenian artefacts, more or less disturbed, some evoking the Upper Magdalenian, others the Middle Magdalenian (between around 18,000 and 14,000 years ago). Between 1935 and 1937, following upheavals in the cave ten years earlier, Marthe and Saint-Just Péquart resumed the Piette excavations in order to identify the Azilian horizon on this left bank and study its stratigraphy. The two bone fragments from these excavations presented in this article, each engraved with a representation of an aurochs, have rarely been published, let alone studied. It is an analysis of the graphic conventions developed by the representations of these two bovids, which are quite different from the rest of the Magdalenian corpus that leads us to question their chrono-cultural attribution. Could these objects be the work of the last Magdalenians, or even the first Azilians in the Mas d’Azil cave? The archaeostratigraphically unsatisfactory conditions in which they were found provide an opportunity for renewed discussion of their stratigraphic origin, and in so doing of the cultural affiliations of their authors. H. Delporte attributes them to an ‘ill-defined Magdalenian’, without however specifying the origin or the reasons for this attribution. As the left bank of the site has been extensively disturbed by successive excavation campaigns (Piette between 1887 and 1894, Breuil in 1901 and 1902), it cannot be ruled out that these two pieces may come from levels other than those envisaged by H. Delporte, and why not from the Azilian. A certain degree of kinship seems to link them with other known works from the post-Magdalenian figurative corpus, within the Azilo-Laborian techno-complexes, at the Paleo-Mesolithic junction. Some of their other graphic characteristics reflect a gradual dilution of Magdalenian art towards new expressive repertoires. The formal singularities and graphic codes of these two representations show us the extreme porosity of styles at the end of the Tardiglacial period. The various analyses and interpretations proposed here are based on new discoveries relating to this Tardiglacial art. The results of the collective research program ‘Archives of a cave: from paleoenvironmental and paleolithic archaeological archives to excavation archives (Mas d’Azil cave, Ariège)’, led by Marc Jarry, Laurent Bruxelles, Céline Pallier (INRAP) and François Bon (UMR Traces–University of Toulouse) since 2018, may also help to confirm their location within the stratigraphy of the site.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46860,"journal":{"name":"Anthropologie","volume":"128 5","pages":"Article 103307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropologie","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003552124000979","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The left bank of the Arize has a particularly important place in the history of the Mas d’Azil cave, as it was on this hundred-meter-long terrace that Édouard Piette (1827–1906) first recognised the Azilian period (between 14,500 and 12,000 cal BP) in 1889. Beneath this Azilian horizon, a flood silt nearly 6 centimeters thick yielded various lenses of Magdalenian artefacts, more or less disturbed, some evoking the Upper Magdalenian, others the Middle Magdalenian (between around 18,000 and 14,000 years ago). Between 1935 and 1937, following upheavals in the cave ten years earlier, Marthe and Saint-Just Péquart resumed the Piette excavations in order to identify the Azilian horizon on this left bank and study its stratigraphy. The two bone fragments from these excavations presented in this article, each engraved with a representation of an aurochs, have rarely been published, let alone studied. It is an analysis of the graphic conventions developed by the representations of these two bovids, which are quite different from the rest of the Magdalenian corpus that leads us to question their chrono-cultural attribution. Could these objects be the work of the last Magdalenians, or even the first Azilians in the Mas d’Azil cave? The archaeostratigraphically unsatisfactory conditions in which they were found provide an opportunity for renewed discussion of their stratigraphic origin, and in so doing of the cultural affiliations of their authors. H. Delporte attributes them to an ‘ill-defined Magdalenian’, without however specifying the origin or the reasons for this attribution. As the left bank of the site has been extensively disturbed by successive excavation campaigns (Piette between 1887 and 1894, Breuil in 1901 and 1902), it cannot be ruled out that these two pieces may come from levels other than those envisaged by H. Delporte, and why not from the Azilian. A certain degree of kinship seems to link them with other known works from the post-Magdalenian figurative corpus, within the Azilo-Laborian techno-complexes, at the Paleo-Mesolithic junction. Some of their other graphic characteristics reflect a gradual dilution of Magdalenian art towards new expressive repertoires. The formal singularities and graphic codes of these two representations show us the extreme porosity of styles at the end of the Tardiglacial period. The various analyses and interpretations proposed here are based on new discoveries relating to this Tardiglacial art. The results of the collective research program ‘Archives of a cave: from paleoenvironmental and paleolithic archaeological archives to excavation archives (Mas d’Azil cave, Ariège)’, led by Marc Jarry, Laurent Bruxelles, Céline Pallier (INRAP) and François Bon (UMR Traces–University of Toulouse) since 2018, may also help to confirm their location within the stratigraphy of the site.
阿齐尔洞穴的左岸在阿齐尔洞穴的历史上有着特别重要的地位,因为正是在这个百米长的阶地上,Édouard Piette(1827-1906)于1889年首次认识到阿齐尔时期(在14500至12,000 cal BP之间)。在阿兹利亚的地平线下,近6厘米厚的洪水淤积的淤泥中产生了各种各样的马格达莱纳时期的文物,这些文物或多或少受到了干扰,有些让人想起了马格达莱纳时期的上马格达莱纳时期,有些则是马格达莱纳时期的中马格达莱纳时期(大约在18000到14000年前)。1935年至1937年间,随着十年前洞穴的动荡,Marthe和Saint-Just pquart恢复了Piette的挖掘工作,以确定左岸的Azilian地平线并研究其地层学。这篇文章中提到的两块骨头碎片,每一块都刻有一头野牛的代表,很少被发表,更不用说研究了。这是对这两种动物的表现所形成的图形惯例的分析,这两种动物与其他的抹大拉语料库有很大的不同,这使我们质疑它们的时间文化归属。这些物品可能是最后的抹大拉人的作品,或者是Mas d 'Azil洞穴中最早的阿兹利亚人的作品?在考古地层学上不能令人满意的条件下,它们被发现了,这为重新讨论它们的地层起源提供了机会,从而也为讨论它们的作者的文化联系提供了机会。H. Delporte将它们归因于“定义不清的抹大拉人”,但没有说明这种归属的来源或原因。由于该遗址的左岸已被连续的挖掘活动(1887年至1894年之间的Piette, 1901年至1902年的Breuil)广泛破坏,不能排除这两件作品可能来自H. Delporte所设想的其他水平,为什么不来自Azilian呢?某种程度的亲缘关系似乎将它们与其他已知的作品联系在一起,这些作品来自后抹大拉时代的比喻语料库,在旧石器时代的交界处,在阿齐罗-拉博里亚技术复合体中。它们的一些其他图形特征反映了马格达莱纳艺术对新的表现性曲目的逐渐稀释。这两种表现形式的奇异性和图形编码向我们展示了缓步期末期风格的极端多孔性。这里提出的各种分析和解释都是基于与这种缓步期艺术有关的新发现。自2018年以来,由Marc Jarry、Laurent Bruxelles、c·帕利埃尔(INRAP)和franois Bon(图卢兹大学UMR Traces-University of Toulouse)领导的集体研究项目“洞穴档案:从古环境和旧石器时代考古档案到挖掘档案(Mas d ' azil洞穴)”的结果也可能有助于确认它们在该遗址地层中的位置。
期刊介绍:
First published in 1890, Anthropologie remains one of the most important journals devoted to prehistoric sciences and paleoanthropology. It regularly publishes thematic issues, originalsarticles and book reviews.