Nature-based fish habitat enrichment of non-damming beaver structures positively affects fish species richness and density

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Joachim Pander, Janette Otterbein, Christoffer Nagel, Juergen Geist
{"title":"Nature-based fish habitat enrichment of non-damming beaver structures positively affects fish species richness and density","authors":"Joachim Pander,&nbsp;Janette Otterbein,&nbsp;Christoffer Nagel,&nbsp;Juergen Geist","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The return of beavers to the strongly structurally altered Central European stream systems results in a variety of conflicts, potentials and opportunities. Among monetary compensation issues for landowners, target species conflicts with fish conservation remain unresolved. This work investigated the impact of beaver structures of the Eurasian beaver (<em>Castor fiber</em> L.) on the fish community of a Bavarian stream system to quantify potential ecosystem services provided by the ecosystem engineering activities of beaver. In addition to beaver structures, artificial structures, constructed from bank clearcuttings, were introduced for comparison. Electrofishing and abiotic measurements were carried out to quantify the effects of the morphological and functional beaver structures on the fish community. In addition, structural characteristics, such as building material and volume, were characterized. Individual fish densities and species diversity were significantly higher in the beaver structures compared to both the reference reaches and the artificial structures. Species such as European chub (<em>Squalius cephalus</em> L.), common dace (<em>Leuciscus leuciscus</em> L.), European spirlin (<em>Alburnoides bipunctatus</em> Bloch 1782), and common nase (<em>Chondrostoma nasus</em> L.) benefited most from the beaver structures, particularly smaller size classes &lt;15 cm. Artificial structures had a lower number of species and individuals. They not only differed from the beaver structures in their general fish communities, but particularly in the presence of target species of conservation and fish sizes. In addition to the already well-documented effects of beaver dams, our findings contribute important knowledge to the ecosystem engineering capabilities of the Eurasian beaver. Since the beneficial fish habitat effects of the beaver structures was mostly related to construction material, positioning, total and pore volume as well as flow velocity, these identified properties can also be used to guide future efforts of nature-based structural enrichment of stream habitats.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107516"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425000047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The return of beavers to the strongly structurally altered Central European stream systems results in a variety of conflicts, potentials and opportunities. Among monetary compensation issues for landowners, target species conflicts with fish conservation remain unresolved. This work investigated the impact of beaver structures of the Eurasian beaver (Castor fiber L.) on the fish community of a Bavarian stream system to quantify potential ecosystem services provided by the ecosystem engineering activities of beaver. In addition to beaver structures, artificial structures, constructed from bank clearcuttings, were introduced for comparison. Electrofishing and abiotic measurements were carried out to quantify the effects of the morphological and functional beaver structures on the fish community. In addition, structural characteristics, such as building material and volume, were characterized. Individual fish densities and species diversity were significantly higher in the beaver structures compared to both the reference reaches and the artificial structures. Species such as European chub (Squalius cephalus L.), common dace (Leuciscus leuciscus L.), European spirlin (Alburnoides bipunctatus Bloch 1782), and common nase (Chondrostoma nasus L.) benefited most from the beaver structures, particularly smaller size classes <15 cm. Artificial structures had a lower number of species and individuals. They not only differed from the beaver structures in their general fish communities, but particularly in the presence of target species of conservation and fish sizes. In addition to the already well-documented effects of beaver dams, our findings contribute important knowledge to the ecosystem engineering capabilities of the Eurasian beaver. Since the beneficial fish habitat effects of the beaver structures was mostly related to construction material, positioning, total and pore volume as well as flow velocity, these identified properties can also be used to guide future efforts of nature-based structural enrichment of stream habitats.

Abstract Image

非筑坝河狸结构的自然鱼类栖息地丰富对鱼类物种丰富度和密度有积极影响
海狸回归到结构发生强烈变化的中欧河流系统,带来了各种各样的冲突、潜力和机会。在土地所有者的货币补偿问题中,目标物种与鱼类保护的冲突仍未得到解决。本文研究了欧亚海狸(Castor fiber L.)的海狸结构对巴伐利亚河流系统鱼类群落的影响,以量化海狸生态系统工程活动提供的潜在生态系统服务。除了河狸结构外,还介绍了用河岸采伐物建造的人工结构进行比较。通过电钓和非生物测量,量化了河狸形态和功能结构对鱼类群落的影响。此外,结构特征,如建筑材料和体积,被表征。与参考河段和人工河段相比,河狸结构中的个体鱼密度和物种多样性均显著高于人工河段。鲟鱼(Squalius cephalus L.)、鲮鱼(Leuciscus Leuciscus L.)、欧洲螺旋藻(Alburnoides bipunctatus Bloch 1782)和普通鼻鱼(Chondrostoma nasus L.)等物种从海狸结构中获益最多,尤其是体型较小的(15厘米)。人工结构的物种和个体数量较少。它们不仅与一般鱼类群落的海狸结构不同,而且在保护目标物种和鱼类大小方面也不同。除了已经有充分记录的海狸水坝的影响外,我们的发现还为欧亚海狸的生态系统工程能力提供了重要的知识。由于河狸结构的有益鱼类栖息地效应主要与建筑材料、位置、总孔隙体积和流速有关,这些特性也可以用于指导未来基于自然的河流栖息地结构富集工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信