Transforming education with AI: A systematic review of ChatGPT's role in learning, academic practices, and institutional adoption

IF 6 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sayeed Salih , Omayma Husain , Mosab Hamdan , Samah Abdelsalam , Hashim Elshafie , Abdelwahed Motwakel
{"title":"Transforming education with AI: A systematic review of ChatGPT's role in learning, academic practices, and institutional adoption","authors":"Sayeed Salih ,&nbsp;Omayma Husain ,&nbsp;Mosab Hamdan ,&nbsp;Samah Abdelsalam ,&nbsp;Hashim Elshafie ,&nbsp;Abdelwahed Motwakel","doi":"10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of AI tools like ChatGPT into education has generated significant interest due to their potential to transform learning environments by providing personalized learning, automating tasks, and improving student engagement. However, gaps remain in the literature, particularly in comparing AI-supported education methods with traditional approaches and understanding ChatGPT's specific role in academic writing, literature reviews, and teacher development. This study addresses these gaps through a systematic literature review (SLR), evaluating the effectiveness of AI tools versus traditional teaching approaches. It focuses on ChatGPT's application in areas such as academic writing, lesson planning, student assessment, and the professional development of educators. Additionally, the study explores institutional strategies for balancing the benefits of AI with the need to maintain academic integrity and educational quality. The methodology involved a systematic search across academic databases with a structured analysis of key studies in AI-supported education. The main contributions include identifying the comparative advantages and limitations of AI in enhancing student learning, offering best practices for incorporating AI tools into teaching, and examining prompt engineering as a crucial factor in optimizing AI usage. The study reveals that ChatGPT and other AI tools significantly enhance educational efficiency and engagement, but they require careful management to prevent over-reliance. The study advocates for a balanced approach, integrating both AI and traditional methods to achieve optimal educational outcomes while maintaining academic integrity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36919,"journal":{"name":"Results in Engineering","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 103837"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123024020802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of AI tools like ChatGPT into education has generated significant interest due to their potential to transform learning environments by providing personalized learning, automating tasks, and improving student engagement. However, gaps remain in the literature, particularly in comparing AI-supported education methods with traditional approaches and understanding ChatGPT's specific role in academic writing, literature reviews, and teacher development. This study addresses these gaps through a systematic literature review (SLR), evaluating the effectiveness of AI tools versus traditional teaching approaches. It focuses on ChatGPT's application in areas such as academic writing, lesson planning, student assessment, and the professional development of educators. Additionally, the study explores institutional strategies for balancing the benefits of AI with the need to maintain academic integrity and educational quality. The methodology involved a systematic search across academic databases with a structured analysis of key studies in AI-supported education. The main contributions include identifying the comparative advantages and limitations of AI in enhancing student learning, offering best practices for incorporating AI tools into teaching, and examining prompt engineering as a crucial factor in optimizing AI usage. The study reveals that ChatGPT and other AI tools significantly enhance educational efficiency and engagement, but they require careful management to prevent over-reliance. The study advocates for a balanced approach, integrating both AI and traditional methods to achieve optimal educational outcomes while maintaining academic integrity.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Results in Engineering
Results in Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
34.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信