Managed coastal dunes and the role of slope in storm impact and recovery

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Michelle E. Harris , Jean T. Ellis
{"title":"Managed coastal dunes and the role of slope in storm impact and recovery","authors":"Michelle E. Harris ,&nbsp;Jean T. Ellis","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coastal dunes protect landward infrastructure from flooding and wave impact during storms. Managed coastal dune systems are becoming the new ‘normal’ along developed coastlines where natural dune growth is often inhibited. Understanding and optimizing managed dune systems is critical for maintaining dune health and resilience. Previous research evaluating dune management strategies and morphology broadly evaluated morphologic impact at varying spatiotemporal scales, but more work is necessary to translate these results to future managed dune systems. This paper investigates the role of the seaward stoss slope for dune evolution and response for two managed systems in South Carolina, U.S.: a nourished dune with a stoss slope of 12° (Site A) and a managed upper backshore with a stoss slope of ∼2° (Site B). Field-based topography and vegetation coverage data are presented for one year, including Hurricane Ian's near-direct impact. Results are subdivided into temporal periods (TPs) to present managed pre-storm, storm-response, unmanaged recovery, managed recovery, and full-study duration comparisons between both sites. Findings support that the variance in stoss slope between sites resulted in differential response throughout the entire study period, attributing to initial dune development rates and recovery potential. Statistically significant (p &lt; 0.01) hot spots of erosion and accretion throughout each TP present site-specific patterns, coupled with contrasting post-storm volumetric changes: −10.5 m<sup>3</sup>/day for Site A and +0.73 m<sup>3</sup>/day for Site B. Vegetation growth from initial planting suggest correlations exist (p &lt; 0.05) between cross-shore placement (e.g., slope) and vegetation growth and retention. Results demonstrate post-storm recovery is best supported in managed dune systems when roughness elements are reinstalled, warranting further investigation on recovery potential for managed dune design. Overall findings from this study suggest trade-offs exist in the benefits derived (e.g., rate, protective capacity) from managed coastal dune system construction metrics that should be carefully considered for future dune management, especially in regions where storms are frequently experienced.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"261 ","pages":"Article 107539"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125000018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coastal dunes protect landward infrastructure from flooding and wave impact during storms. Managed coastal dune systems are becoming the new ‘normal’ along developed coastlines where natural dune growth is often inhibited. Understanding and optimizing managed dune systems is critical for maintaining dune health and resilience. Previous research evaluating dune management strategies and morphology broadly evaluated morphologic impact at varying spatiotemporal scales, but more work is necessary to translate these results to future managed dune systems. This paper investigates the role of the seaward stoss slope for dune evolution and response for two managed systems in South Carolina, U.S.: a nourished dune with a stoss slope of 12° (Site A) and a managed upper backshore with a stoss slope of ∼2° (Site B). Field-based topography and vegetation coverage data are presented for one year, including Hurricane Ian's near-direct impact. Results are subdivided into temporal periods (TPs) to present managed pre-storm, storm-response, unmanaged recovery, managed recovery, and full-study duration comparisons between both sites. Findings support that the variance in stoss slope between sites resulted in differential response throughout the entire study period, attributing to initial dune development rates and recovery potential. Statistically significant (p < 0.01) hot spots of erosion and accretion throughout each TP present site-specific patterns, coupled with contrasting post-storm volumetric changes: −10.5 m3/day for Site A and +0.73 m3/day for Site B. Vegetation growth from initial planting suggest correlations exist (p < 0.05) between cross-shore placement (e.g., slope) and vegetation growth and retention. Results demonstrate post-storm recovery is best supported in managed dune systems when roughness elements are reinstalled, warranting further investigation on recovery potential for managed dune design. Overall findings from this study suggest trade-offs exist in the benefits derived (e.g., rate, protective capacity) from managed coastal dune system construction metrics that should be carefully considered for future dune management, especially in regions where storms are frequently experienced.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信