Comparative evaluation of the carbon storage capacities in urban stormwater nature-based technologies

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Md Tashdedul Haque , Franz Kevin F. Geronimo , Miguel Enrico L. Robles , Chiny Vispo , Lee-Hyung Kim
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of the carbon storage capacities in urban stormwater nature-based technologies","authors":"Md Tashdedul Haque ,&nbsp;Franz Kevin F. Geronimo ,&nbsp;Miguel Enrico L. Robles ,&nbsp;Chiny Vispo ,&nbsp;Lee-Hyung Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Low Impact Development (LID) technologies offer enormous environmental benefits regarding ecosystem services, such as biodiversity support, carbon sequestration, and improved air quality. This study compares and quantifies soil organic carbon (SOC) storage in different LID technologies and investigates the factors affecting carbon storage. It was found that the SOC percentages ranged from 0.8 % to 4.5 % across LID technologies, with the surface constructed wetlands (SCW) and tree box filter exhibiting relatively higher content attributed to root turnover, stormwater runoff, and media composition. Moreover, SCW exhibited the highest SOC content compared to other technologies for the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm layers. There were linkages identified between the soil's physico chemical properties, but the majority of the correlations were weak to moderate. Among the investigated soil physico chemical characteristics, TN exhibited considerable correlation with SOC content. Additionally, the results from the LID technologies were compared to findings from other studies, which emphasized the role of these technologies in carbon sequestration, green space expansion, and the promotion of environmental sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107539"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425000278","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low Impact Development (LID) technologies offer enormous environmental benefits regarding ecosystem services, such as biodiversity support, carbon sequestration, and improved air quality. This study compares and quantifies soil organic carbon (SOC) storage in different LID technologies and investigates the factors affecting carbon storage. It was found that the SOC percentages ranged from 0.8 % to 4.5 % across LID technologies, with the surface constructed wetlands (SCW) and tree box filter exhibiting relatively higher content attributed to root turnover, stormwater runoff, and media composition. Moreover, SCW exhibited the highest SOC content compared to other technologies for the 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm layers. There were linkages identified between the soil's physico chemical properties, but the majority of the correlations were weak to moderate. Among the investigated soil physico chemical characteristics, TN exhibited considerable correlation with SOC content. Additionally, the results from the LID technologies were compared to findings from other studies, which emphasized the role of these technologies in carbon sequestration, green space expansion, and the promotion of environmental sustainability.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信