{"title":"Preliminary analysis of the construction and operation status of fish passage facility in China","authors":"Yingjun Yu, Jianbo Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past 60 years, fish passage facilities have been extensively constructed in China. To evaluate their construction and operational status, we developed a comprehensive database of 211 facilities, including 172 completed and 39 incomplete as of 2023, and conducted a literature review encompassing operational records for 18 facilities. Firstly, the results reveal three distinct phases in the development of fish passage facilities in China (1960–1980, 1981–2004, and 2005–2023), supported by quantitative evidence. The dataset clearly illustrates the construction status of these facilities across the country. Secondly, vertical slot type fishways emerged as the most prevalent type, accounting for 48.1 % of the 201 facilities with known types, while newer facility types, such as fish lifts and nature-like bypass channels, began construction only after 2010. The geographical distribution of facilities is notably uneven, with the Yangtze River Basin hosting the highest concentration. Thirdly, compared to the construction data, operational records for facilities in China remain scarce. Among the 18 projects reviewed, operational records from 9 facilities indicate that only some primary target species utilized the facilities, whereas numerous non-target species were successfully observed. This highlights the significant ecological role of fish passage facilities in promoting fish connectivity and biodiversity. Finally, there is a clear and growing demand for the continued construction of fish passage facilities in China. To enhance their effectiveness, it is recommended to establish a standardized evaluation system during their operational phase and to prioritize the downstream migratory needs of fish, as information on this aspect remains insufficient.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107515"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425000035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over the past 60 years, fish passage facilities have been extensively constructed in China. To evaluate their construction and operational status, we developed a comprehensive database of 211 facilities, including 172 completed and 39 incomplete as of 2023, and conducted a literature review encompassing operational records for 18 facilities. Firstly, the results reveal three distinct phases in the development of fish passage facilities in China (1960–1980, 1981–2004, and 2005–2023), supported by quantitative evidence. The dataset clearly illustrates the construction status of these facilities across the country. Secondly, vertical slot type fishways emerged as the most prevalent type, accounting for 48.1 % of the 201 facilities with known types, while newer facility types, such as fish lifts and nature-like bypass channels, began construction only after 2010. The geographical distribution of facilities is notably uneven, with the Yangtze River Basin hosting the highest concentration. Thirdly, compared to the construction data, operational records for facilities in China remain scarce. Among the 18 projects reviewed, operational records from 9 facilities indicate that only some primary target species utilized the facilities, whereas numerous non-target species were successfully observed. This highlights the significant ecological role of fish passage facilities in promoting fish connectivity and biodiversity. Finally, there is a clear and growing demand for the continued construction of fish passage facilities in China. To enhance their effectiveness, it is recommended to establish a standardized evaluation system during their operational phase and to prioritize the downstream migratory needs of fish, as information on this aspect remains insufficient.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.