Soil and Water Bioengineering (SWBE) in Africa: First experience and lessons-learned in Burundi

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Federico Preti , Cesare Crocetti , Severin Nijimbere , Jean Marie Vianney Nsabiyumva , Cyrille Hicintuka , Giulio Castelli
{"title":"Soil and Water Bioengineering (SWBE) in Africa: First experience and lessons-learned in Burundi","authors":"Federico Preti ,&nbsp;Cesare Crocetti ,&nbsp;Severin Nijimbere ,&nbsp;Jean Marie Vianney Nsabiyumva ,&nbsp;Cyrille Hicintuka ,&nbsp;Giulio Castelli","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Burundi's landscapes are threatened by land degradation and erosion, like many other countries in Central Africa. Environmentally, socially, and economically sustainable technologies should be investigated to address the issue, and Soil and Water Bioengineering (SWBE) represents a suitable solution. This study describes the first-ever application of SWBE in the country, realized within the World Bank's Burundi Landscape Restoration and Resilience Project (PRRPB). An experimental installation of SWBE was implemented in the hilly Isare municipality (Colline) using the training sites method. The overall feasibility of the installation was evaluated through an analysis of the growth of the plants used – a botanic analysis - a transferability analysis and a cost analysis. The botanic monitoring highlighted that a relatively good survival rate was achieved at the site of the experimentation. The transferability analysis results showed minor constraints (mainly know-how on SWBE techniques and the availability of materials, qualified labor, and equipment and mechanical instruments) but no major ones. On the other hand, the presence of high botanical knowledge, jointly with the local biodiversity, and the economic advantages of SWBE, represent decisive factors that can guarantee successful transferability. In terms of costs of a sample SWBE technology (double crib wall), our results show a reduction of 42 % and 72 % in terms of Purchasing Power Parity $ (PPP$) for mechanical and manual excavation respectively, with reference to the cost of the same work in an EU country (Italy). In addition to this, such technology is much cheaper than a gabion wall (−25 % if the crib wall is installed with mechanical excavation; −105 % if with manual excavation) and a concrete wall (−326 % with mechanical excavation; −598 % with manual excavation). The results of this paper show that SWBE is potentially transferable to Burundi, allowing the solution of some of the land degradation problems in the country, specifically targeting small- to medium-sized landslides, and also to countries with similar landscapes and social settings. More experimental installations and more research on the barriers should be realized. The proposed approach can be replicated in any central African country endangered by erosion and landslides.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107510"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424003355","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Burundi's landscapes are threatened by land degradation and erosion, like many other countries in Central Africa. Environmentally, socially, and economically sustainable technologies should be investigated to address the issue, and Soil and Water Bioengineering (SWBE) represents a suitable solution. This study describes the first-ever application of SWBE in the country, realized within the World Bank's Burundi Landscape Restoration and Resilience Project (PRRPB). An experimental installation of SWBE was implemented in the hilly Isare municipality (Colline) using the training sites method. The overall feasibility of the installation was evaluated through an analysis of the growth of the plants used – a botanic analysis - a transferability analysis and a cost analysis. The botanic monitoring highlighted that a relatively good survival rate was achieved at the site of the experimentation. The transferability analysis results showed minor constraints (mainly know-how on SWBE techniques and the availability of materials, qualified labor, and equipment and mechanical instruments) but no major ones. On the other hand, the presence of high botanical knowledge, jointly with the local biodiversity, and the economic advantages of SWBE, represent decisive factors that can guarantee successful transferability. In terms of costs of a sample SWBE technology (double crib wall), our results show a reduction of 42 % and 72 % in terms of Purchasing Power Parity $ (PPP$) for mechanical and manual excavation respectively, with reference to the cost of the same work in an EU country (Italy). In addition to this, such technology is much cheaper than a gabion wall (−25 % if the crib wall is installed with mechanical excavation; −105 % if with manual excavation) and a concrete wall (−326 % with mechanical excavation; −598 % with manual excavation). The results of this paper show that SWBE is potentially transferable to Burundi, allowing the solution of some of the land degradation problems in the country, specifically targeting small- to medium-sized landslides, and also to countries with similar landscapes and social settings. More experimental installations and more research on the barriers should be realized. The proposed approach can be replicated in any central African country endangered by erosion and landslides.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信