Impacts of flood retention dams on benthic invertebrates by affecting bed material size and disturbance in reservoir and downstream sections

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ryota Nakamura, Sohei Kobayashi, Sameh Ahmed Kantoush, Tetsuya Sumi
{"title":"Impacts of flood retention dams on benthic invertebrates by affecting bed material size and disturbance in reservoir and downstream sections","authors":"Ryota Nakamura,&nbsp;Sohei Kobayashi,&nbsp;Sameh Ahmed Kantoush,&nbsp;Tetsuya Sumi","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The impacts of Flood Retention Dams (FRDs), designed solely for flood control and featuring bottom outlets at the riverbed level, on benthic invertebrate communities have not been sufficiently elucidated. This study investigated the impact of FRDs on benthic invertebrate communities downstream and reservoirs, focusing on differences in riverbed conditions and bed disturbances caused by reservoir sedimentation. We compared benthic invertebrate communities and riverbed conditions at upstream, reservoir, and downstream sites from seven FRDs in Japan. The average community similarity between the upstream and downstream sites across the seven dams was 0.73, comparable to unregulated streams. They were not related to the duration of dam operation, indicating minimal long-term impacts on downstream communities. However, the community similarity between the upstream and reservoir sites was notably lower, at 0.66. Reservoir sites had smaller grain sizes and softer substrates with narrower interstitial spaces than upstream sites. Consequently, taxes that inhabit or move across stone surfaces were more common in reservoirs. Conversely, taxa that prefer stable beds and larger body sizes were less frequent. Additionally, we found that reservoir sedimentation fluctuations, which indicates riverbed disturbance pattern, influence the similarity of invertebrate communities between upstream and downstream sites. To conclude, FRDs have negligible impacts on benthic invertebrate communities at DS sites; smaller grain sizes modulate these communities at RS sites. Predicting reservoir sedimentation fluctuations supports the design of FRDs with minimal impacts on benthic invertebrates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107509"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424003343","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impacts of Flood Retention Dams (FRDs), designed solely for flood control and featuring bottom outlets at the riverbed level, on benthic invertebrate communities have not been sufficiently elucidated. This study investigated the impact of FRDs on benthic invertebrate communities downstream and reservoirs, focusing on differences in riverbed conditions and bed disturbances caused by reservoir sedimentation. We compared benthic invertebrate communities and riverbed conditions at upstream, reservoir, and downstream sites from seven FRDs in Japan. The average community similarity between the upstream and downstream sites across the seven dams was 0.73, comparable to unregulated streams. They were not related to the duration of dam operation, indicating minimal long-term impacts on downstream communities. However, the community similarity between the upstream and reservoir sites was notably lower, at 0.66. Reservoir sites had smaller grain sizes and softer substrates with narrower interstitial spaces than upstream sites. Consequently, taxes that inhabit or move across stone surfaces were more common in reservoirs. Conversely, taxa that prefer stable beds and larger body sizes were less frequent. Additionally, we found that reservoir sedimentation fluctuations, which indicates riverbed disturbance pattern, influence the similarity of invertebrate communities between upstream and downstream sites. To conclude, FRDs have negligible impacts on benthic invertebrate communities at DS sites; smaller grain sizes modulate these communities at RS sites. Predicting reservoir sedimentation fluctuations supports the design of FRDs with minimal impacts on benthic invertebrates.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信