Effect of materials types of water-land junction settings on soil bacterial community structure in Shanghai riverside ecological corridor

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Wei Guan , Songshuo Li , Qing Wang , Chenyan Sha , Jinghua Su , Min Wang , Ming Nie , Meng Lu
{"title":"Effect of materials types of water-land junction settings on soil bacterial community structure in Shanghai riverside ecological corridor","authors":"Wei Guan ,&nbsp;Songshuo Li ,&nbsp;Qing Wang ,&nbsp;Chenyan Sha ,&nbsp;Jinghua Su ,&nbsp;Min Wang ,&nbsp;Ming Nie ,&nbsp;Meng Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the context of accelerated global urbanization, the construction of urban riverside ecological corridors increases the aesthetics of cities as well as people's recreational experience. The setup of water-land junction from different materials in riverside ecological corridors may have effects on the soil physicochemical properties and the structure of bacterial communities. Despite their relevance and importance to human well-being, urban soil microbes of riverside ecological corridors are poorly understood. In this study, the two most common material types of water-land junction in Shanghai, natural soil and artificial concrete are selected for the comparison. The results showed that natural soil water-land junction had a higher soil water content, organic carbon and total nitrogen than artificial concrete due to the influence of the river. Meanwhile, the difference of soil properties between the two types junctions is more obvious in topsoil and near river areas. The artificial concrete junction had a higher homogeneity among its own sites due to the obstruction of material-energy exchange between water and land, with only variations in pH and soil bulk density. Therefore, there are significant differences in the bacterial composition and structure of the sites between the two types of corridors, especially in the abundance of Actinomycetales, Rhizobiales, Gaiellales, etc., which are more sensitive to soil moisture and nutrients. In general, according to our analysis, natural soil water-land junction corridors are superior to artificial concrete from the perspective of soil ecology, which can provide a certain scientific basis for urban waterside managers and corridor builders in terms of urbanization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107501"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424003264","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of accelerated global urbanization, the construction of urban riverside ecological corridors increases the aesthetics of cities as well as people's recreational experience. The setup of water-land junction from different materials in riverside ecological corridors may have effects on the soil physicochemical properties and the structure of bacterial communities. Despite their relevance and importance to human well-being, urban soil microbes of riverside ecological corridors are poorly understood. In this study, the two most common material types of water-land junction in Shanghai, natural soil and artificial concrete are selected for the comparison. The results showed that natural soil water-land junction had a higher soil water content, organic carbon and total nitrogen than artificial concrete due to the influence of the river. Meanwhile, the difference of soil properties between the two types junctions is more obvious in topsoil and near river areas. The artificial concrete junction had a higher homogeneity among its own sites due to the obstruction of material-energy exchange between water and land, with only variations in pH and soil bulk density. Therefore, there are significant differences in the bacterial composition and structure of the sites between the two types of corridors, especially in the abundance of Actinomycetales, Rhizobiales, Gaiellales, etc., which are more sensitive to soil moisture and nutrients. In general, according to our analysis, natural soil water-land junction corridors are superior to artificial concrete from the perspective of soil ecology, which can provide a certain scientific basis for urban waterside managers and corridor builders in terms of urbanization.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信