Study on the predictability of new topics of scholars: A machine learning-based approach using knowledge networks

IF 3.4 2区 管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Zhixiang Wu , Hucheng Jiang , Lianjie Xiao , Hao Wang , Jin Mao
{"title":"Study on the predictability of new topics of scholars: A machine learning-based approach using knowledge networks","authors":"Zhixiang Wu ,&nbsp;Hucheng Jiang ,&nbsp;Lianjie Xiao ,&nbsp;Hao Wang ,&nbsp;Jin Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2025.101637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Scholars continuously explore new research topics to drive personal academic achievements. While factors influencing topic selection exist, the predictability of scholars’ choices regarding new topics is not yet fully understood. To bridge the gap, this study investigates the predictability of <em>new topics of scholars (NTS)</em>. The research task is transformed into a binary classification, predicting whether <em>NTS</em> that appear in the disciplinary knowledge network will be adopted by a scholar in the future. Using PubMed Knowledge Graph (PKG) as the data source, over 17,000 local knowledge networks (LKNs) of individual scholars are constructed, along with a global knowledge network (GKN) of all the scholars in the database. Sixteen features of knowledge network topology and candidate topics are extracted, and seven machine learning algorithms are applied. Our large-scale experiments show that the best prediction model achieves an F1 score of 86.49%. Shapley values provide more interpretable results. A 1-year observation window appears to be sufficient for making predictions. Novel topics and young scholars exhibit good predictability. Our findings provide profound insights into the predictability of scholars' topic selection and offer practical implications for future in-depth studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Informetrics","volume":"19 1","pages":"Article 101637"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Informetrics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175115772500001X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars continuously explore new research topics to drive personal academic achievements. While factors influencing topic selection exist, the predictability of scholars’ choices regarding new topics is not yet fully understood. To bridge the gap, this study investigates the predictability of new topics of scholars (NTS). The research task is transformed into a binary classification, predicting whether NTS that appear in the disciplinary knowledge network will be adopted by a scholar in the future. Using PubMed Knowledge Graph (PKG) as the data source, over 17,000 local knowledge networks (LKNs) of individual scholars are constructed, along with a global knowledge network (GKN) of all the scholars in the database. Sixteen features of knowledge network topology and candidate topics are extracted, and seven machine learning algorithms are applied. Our large-scale experiments show that the best prediction model achieves an F1 score of 86.49%. Shapley values provide more interpretable results. A 1-year observation window appears to be sufficient for making predictions. Novel topics and young scholars exhibit good predictability. Our findings provide profound insights into the predictability of scholars' topic selection and offer practical implications for future in-depth studies.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Informetrics
Journal of Informetrics Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Journal of Informetrics (JOI) publishes rigorous high-quality research on quantitative aspects of information science. The main focus of the journal is on topics in bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics, patentometrics, altmetrics and research evaluation. Contributions studying informetric problems using methods from other quantitative fields, such as mathematics, statistics, computer science, economics and econometrics, and network science, are especially encouraged. JOI publishes both theoretical and empirical work. In general, case studies, for instance a bibliometric analysis focusing on a specific research field or a specific country, are not considered suitable for publication in JOI, unless they contain innovative methodological elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信