Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with cytology and human papillomavirus co-testing: A 12-year retrospective study in Oyama district, Japan

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Hiroyuki Fujiwara , Yuji Takei , Yasushi Saga , Seung Chik Jwa , Akiyo Taneichi , Takahiro Koyanagi , Yoshifumi Takahashi , Suzuyo Takahashi , Kohei Tamura , Miki Shinohara , Mitsuaki Suzuki
{"title":"Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with cytology and human papillomavirus co-testing: A 12-year retrospective study in Oyama district, Japan","authors":"Hiroyuki Fujiwara ,&nbsp;Yuji Takei ,&nbsp;Yasushi Saga ,&nbsp;Seung Chik Jwa ,&nbsp;Akiyo Taneichi ,&nbsp;Takahiro Koyanagi ,&nbsp;Yoshifumi Takahashi ,&nbsp;Suzuyo Takahashi ,&nbsp;Kohei Tamura ,&nbsp;Miki Shinohara ,&nbsp;Mitsuaki Suzuki","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2025.102762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) co-testing in Japan.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was conducted in Oyama district, Japan, where cytology and HPV co-testing has been implemented since 2012. Data for 2012–2020 were retrospectively analyzed; results were compared with those of cytology-alone screening conducted from 2009 to 2011. Screening outcomes, including referral rate and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2, CIN3/adenocarcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma detection rates, were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Co-testing and cytology-alone screening were performed in 62,155 and 34,040 individuals, respectively; the corresponding referral rates were 4.1 % and 1.9 %. Co-testing resulted in significantly higher referral rates but decreasing trends over time (4.6 %, 4.0 %, and 3.8 % in 2012–2014, 2015–2017, and 2018–2020, respectively). The CIN2 detection rate, which was 0.2 % during the era of cytology alone, significantly increased to 0.49 % during 2012–2014 after the introduction of co-testing and remained higher at 0.31 % during 2015–2017 and 0.37 % during 2018–2020. In contrast, the CIN3 + detection rate increased from 0.13 % during the era of cytology alone to 0.19 % during 2012–2014 but significantly decreased to 0.14 % and 0.06 % during 2015–2017 and 2018–2020, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our long-term data and comparison with historical controls indicate that co-testing resulted in a higher CIN2 detection rate, potentially reducing CIN3 + community incidence. Although referral rate initially increased with co-testing, a decreasing trend was noted over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 102762"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877782125000219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) co-testing in Japan.

Methods

The study was conducted in Oyama district, Japan, where cytology and HPV co-testing has been implemented since 2012. Data for 2012–2020 were retrospectively analyzed; results were compared with those of cytology-alone screening conducted from 2009 to 2011. Screening outcomes, including referral rate and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2, CIN3/adenocarcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma detection rates, were assessed.

Results

Co-testing and cytology-alone screening were performed in 62,155 and 34,040 individuals, respectively; the corresponding referral rates were 4.1 % and 1.9 %. Co-testing resulted in significantly higher referral rates but decreasing trends over time (4.6 %, 4.0 %, and 3.8 % in 2012–2014, 2015–2017, and 2018–2020, respectively). The CIN2 detection rate, which was 0.2 % during the era of cytology alone, significantly increased to 0.49 % during 2012–2014 after the introduction of co-testing and remained higher at 0.31 % during 2015–2017 and 0.37 % during 2018–2020. In contrast, the CIN3 + detection rate increased from 0.13 % during the era of cytology alone to 0.19 % during 2012–2014 but significantly decreased to 0.14 % and 0.06 % during 2015–2017 and 2018–2020, respectively.

Conclusion

Our long-term data and comparison with historical controls indicate that co-testing resulted in a higher CIN2 detection rate, potentially reducing CIN3 + community incidence. Although referral rate initially increased with co-testing, a decreasing trend was noted over time.
细胞学和人乳头瘤病毒联合检测宫颈癌筛查的有效性:日本Oyama地区12年回顾性研究
本研究旨在评价日本宫颈癌细胞学和人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)联合检测的有效性。方法本研究在日本Oyama地区进行,该地区自2012年以来一直实施细胞学和HPV联合检测。回顾性分析2012-2020年的数据;结果与2009 ~ 2011年细胞学单独筛查结果进行比较。评估筛查结果,包括转诊率、宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)2、CIN3/原位腺癌和浸润性癌检出率。结果分别有62,155例和34,040例患者进行了sco检测和细胞学筛查;相应的转诊率分别为4.1 %和1.9 %。联合检测导致转诊率显著升高,但随着时间的推移呈下降趋势(2012-2014年、2015-2017年和2018-2020年分别为4.6% %、4.0% %和3.8% %)。单独细胞学时代的CIN2检出率为0.2 %,引入联合检测后,2012-2014年CIN2检出率显著增加至0.49 %,2015-2017年为0.31 %,2018-2020年为0.37 %。相比之下,CIN3 + 检出率从单独细胞学时代的0.13 %上升到2012-2014年的0.19 %,但在2015-2017年和2018-2020年分别显著下降到0.14 %和0.06 %。我们的长期数据和与历史对照的比较表明,联合检测可提高CIN2检出率,可能降低CIN3 + 社区发病率。虽然联合检测的转诊率最初有所增加,但随着时间的推移呈下降趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology
Cancer Epidemiology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
200
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology is dedicated to increasing understanding about cancer causes, prevention and control. The scope of the journal embraces all aspects of cancer epidemiology including: • Descriptive epidemiology • Studies of risk factors for disease initiation, development and prognosis • Screening and early detection • Prevention and control • Methodological issues The journal publishes original research articles (full length and short reports), systematic reviews and meta-analyses, editorials, commentaries and letters to the editor commenting on previously published research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信