Mode choice inertia and shock: Three months of almost fare-free public transport in Germany

IF 1.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 ECONOMICS
Maria Fernanda Guajardo Ortega, Heike Link
{"title":"Mode choice inertia and shock: Three months of almost fare-free public transport in Germany","authors":"Maria Fernanda Guajardo Ortega,&nbsp;Heike Link","doi":"10.1016/j.ecotra.2024.100382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study analyses travellers’ behavioural responses to two temporal measures implemented by the German government: the reduction in public transport prices, making it almost fare-free, and a decrease in fuel taxes to the minimum level permitted by European law. Based on a panel dataset of GPS-tracked trips collected before and during the price intervention from a representative sample of 276 individuals, with 1650 commuter trips per month. We estimate mixed logit models incorporating two temporal effects—inertia and shock—to account for habitual behaviour and capture both interventions' impact. The only travel mode with significant inertia is car, indicating that car drivers are less likely to change their travel mode. While the shock parameter for the fuel price intervention was not significant, we found a significant and positive shock effect for public transport which decreased over time during the policy. Furthermore, elasticities calculated pre- and during the intervention are considerably lower when habitual behaviour is considered. From the existence of inertia effects and low price elasticities, we conclude that the temporary intervention of almost fare-free public transport alone was not sufficient to achieve a modal shift from car to public transport for commuter trips.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45761,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Transportation","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100382"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212012224000418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyses travellers’ behavioural responses to two temporal measures implemented by the German government: the reduction in public transport prices, making it almost fare-free, and a decrease in fuel taxes to the minimum level permitted by European law. Based on a panel dataset of GPS-tracked trips collected before and during the price intervention from a representative sample of 276 individuals, with 1650 commuter trips per month. We estimate mixed logit models incorporating two temporal effects—inertia and shock—to account for habitual behaviour and capture both interventions' impact. The only travel mode with significant inertia is car, indicating that car drivers are less likely to change their travel mode. While the shock parameter for the fuel price intervention was not significant, we found a significant and positive shock effect for public transport which decreased over time during the policy. Furthermore, elasticities calculated pre- and during the intervention are considerably lower when habitual behaviour is considered. From the existence of inertia effects and low price elasticities, we conclude that the temporary intervention of almost fare-free public transport alone was not sufficient to achieve a modal shift from car to public transport for commuter trips.
模式选择的惯性和冲击:德国公共交通三个月几乎免费
这项研究分析了旅行者对德国政府实施的两项临时措施的行为反应:降低公共交通价格,使其几乎免费,以及将燃油税降低到欧洲法律允许的最低水平。基于在价格干预之前和期间收集的gps跟踪旅行的面板数据集,这些数据来自276个具有代表性的样本,每月有1650次通勤旅行。我们估计混合logit模型包含两种时间效应——惯性和冲击——来解释习惯行为,并捕捉两种干预措施的影响。唯一具有显著惯性的出行方式是汽车,这表明汽车驾驶员改变出行方式的可能性较小。虽然燃油价格干预的冲击参数不显著,但我们发现公共交通的冲击效应显著且积极,随着政策的实施时间的推移而下降。此外,当考虑习惯行为时,干预前和干预期间计算的弹性要低得多。从惯性效应和低价格弹性的存在来看,我们得出结论,仅靠几乎免费的公共交通的临时干预不足以实现通勤出行方式从汽车转向公共交通的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信