Low-carbon berth allocation: An analysis of the effectiveness of an enhanced multi-objective artificial bee colony algorithm based on a case study

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Xiaomeng Ma, Xujin Pu
{"title":"Low-carbon berth allocation: An analysis of the effectiveness of an enhanced multi-objective artificial bee colony algorithm based on a case study","authors":"Xiaomeng Ma,&nbsp;Xujin Pu","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Marine terminals are essential components of international trade networks and global markets. To guarantee the rapid and consistent growth in maritime trade, managers must employ suitable techniques to handle operational challenges and meet market needs. One of the critical decisions in operational planning is the allocation of berths. A well-designed berth allocation plan can greatly boost the productivity and competitiveness of seaports. Despite the extensive research on berth allocation, there remains a notable gap in studies focusing on low-carbon berth allocation. As energy shortages and global warming intensify, low-carbon has increasingly become key terms across various sectors. Under the circumstances, this work addresses a multi-objective stochastic berth allocation problem for minimizing the average carbon emission and total service time. Firstly, a stochastic programming method is employed to formulate the uncertain arrival time and operation time of vessels, then a multi-objective chance-constrained programming model is constructed to formulate the studied problem. Secondly, an enhanced multi-objective artificial bee colony algorithm incorporating stochastic simulation (EMOABC) is specially designed. Finally, a large number of comparison experiments between EMOABC and nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) are performed. Through observing and analyzing the experimental results, two conclusions are acquired as follows: (i) EMOABC obtains the smaller IGD values and larger HV values than NSGA-II on all the test instances, indicating that it has better performance than NSGA-II for solving the considered problem; and (ii) EMOABC uses less running time in dealing with test problems of different scales compared to NSGA-II, suggesting that it has lower computational complexity than NSGA-II.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"261 ","pages":"Article 107529"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569124005143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marine terminals are essential components of international trade networks and global markets. To guarantee the rapid and consistent growth in maritime trade, managers must employ suitable techniques to handle operational challenges and meet market needs. One of the critical decisions in operational planning is the allocation of berths. A well-designed berth allocation plan can greatly boost the productivity and competitiveness of seaports. Despite the extensive research on berth allocation, there remains a notable gap in studies focusing on low-carbon berth allocation. As energy shortages and global warming intensify, low-carbon has increasingly become key terms across various sectors. Under the circumstances, this work addresses a multi-objective stochastic berth allocation problem for minimizing the average carbon emission and total service time. Firstly, a stochastic programming method is employed to formulate the uncertain arrival time and operation time of vessels, then a multi-objective chance-constrained programming model is constructed to formulate the studied problem. Secondly, an enhanced multi-objective artificial bee colony algorithm incorporating stochastic simulation (EMOABC) is specially designed. Finally, a large number of comparison experiments between EMOABC and nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) are performed. Through observing and analyzing the experimental results, two conclusions are acquired as follows: (i) EMOABC obtains the smaller IGD values and larger HV values than NSGA-II on all the test instances, indicating that it has better performance than NSGA-II for solving the considered problem; and (ii) EMOABC uses less running time in dealing with test problems of different scales compared to NSGA-II, suggesting that it has lower computational complexity than NSGA-II.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信