Additively manufactured stochastic and gyroid scaffold design towards osseointegration and bone regeneration in a rabbit femur model

IF 7.6 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Susheem Kanwar , Oraib Al-Ketan , Gopinathan Janarthanan , Sanjairaj Vijayavenkataraman
{"title":"Additively manufactured stochastic and gyroid scaffold design towards osseointegration and bone regeneration in a rabbit femur model","authors":"Susheem Kanwar ,&nbsp;Oraib Al-Ketan ,&nbsp;Gopinathan Janarthanan ,&nbsp;Sanjairaj Vijayavenkataraman","doi":"10.1016/j.matdes.2025.113604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The design of scaffolds has evolved overtime from simple geometries such as non-porous structures to more advanced lattice-based structures such as triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS). This evolution brought along better response to implants in terms of compatibility and promotion of cell ingrowth. The use of novel designs like stochastic designs, impart the user with the ability to locally control the porosity of the scaffold and thus fine tune its functional and structural properties like stiffness and porosity gradient. Stochastic structures with locally controlled porosity better replicate the microstructural complexity of natural tissues. In this paper, the versatility of the stochastic scaffold design approach was tested by mimicking the porosity gradient of a bone in all three axes (labelled as uniaxial, biaxial and triaxial) and successfully printing them using multiple different 3D printing processes. These designs were then tested for cell viability <em>in vitro</em> and since all functionally graded scaffolds along with the relatively simpler uniform porosity design displayed positive results, the stochastic scaffold with uniform porosity was selected for <em>in vivo</em> studies involving a rabbit femur model along with a solid cylinder and gyroid TPMS structure as controls. The titanium alloy samples used for <em>in vivo</em> testing were evaluated for their mechanical properties which were in the range of the native trabecular bone and supported statistically significant cell growth. The scaffolds elicited minimal immune responses <em>in vivo</em> on implantation in rabbits and effectively supported bone growth and integration without significant adverse effects. While the performance differences between porous designs were minimal, the stochastic scaffolds demonstrated slightly superior scores and staining results compared to gyroid scaffolds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":383,"journal":{"name":"Materials & Design","volume":"250 ","pages":"Article 113604"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials & Design","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264127525000243","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The design of scaffolds has evolved overtime from simple geometries such as non-porous structures to more advanced lattice-based structures such as triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS). This evolution brought along better response to implants in terms of compatibility and promotion of cell ingrowth. The use of novel designs like stochastic designs, impart the user with the ability to locally control the porosity of the scaffold and thus fine tune its functional and structural properties like stiffness and porosity gradient. Stochastic structures with locally controlled porosity better replicate the microstructural complexity of natural tissues. In this paper, the versatility of the stochastic scaffold design approach was tested by mimicking the porosity gradient of a bone in all three axes (labelled as uniaxial, biaxial and triaxial) and successfully printing them using multiple different 3D printing processes. These designs were then tested for cell viability in vitro and since all functionally graded scaffolds along with the relatively simpler uniform porosity design displayed positive results, the stochastic scaffold with uniform porosity was selected for in vivo studies involving a rabbit femur model along with a solid cylinder and gyroid TPMS structure as controls. The titanium alloy samples used for in vivo testing were evaluated for their mechanical properties which were in the range of the native trabecular bone and supported statistically significant cell growth. The scaffolds elicited minimal immune responses in vivo on implantation in rabbits and effectively supported bone growth and integration without significant adverse effects. While the performance differences between porous designs were minimal, the stochastic scaffolds demonstrated slightly superior scores and staining results compared to gyroid scaffolds.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Materials & Design
Materials & Design Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1028
审稿时长
85 days
期刊介绍: Materials and Design is a multi-disciplinary journal that publishes original research reports, review articles, and express communications. The journal focuses on studying the structure and properties of inorganic and organic materials, advancements in synthesis, processing, characterization, and testing, the design of materials and engineering systems, and their applications in technology. It aims to bring together various aspects of materials science, engineering, physics, and chemistry. The journal explores themes ranging from materials to design and aims to reveal the connections between natural and artificial materials, as well as experiment and modeling. Manuscripts submitted to Materials and Design should contain elements of discovery and surprise, as they often contribute new insights into the architecture and function of matter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信